Small Business Compliance
- Accrual Method: Employees accrue 1 hour of paid sick time for
every 30 hours worked, and unused paid sick time rolls over up
to 72 hours, or 40 for a small business. Employers may limit the
use of earned sick time to 72 hours, or 40 for a small business,
in the 12-month period. - New Hire Waiting Period: If using the accrual method,
employers may have a policy for new employees hired on or
after Feb. 21, 2025, requiring these employees to wait up to 120
days before using accrued sick time. Employees accrue earned
sick time during this waiting period. If frontloading, hours are
available for immediate use. - Small Business Compliance: Small businesses have until Oct.
1, 2025, to comply with ESTA requirements. Small business is
defined as an employer having 10 or fewer employees.
How to determine if an employer is a “small business” under the ESTA?
- All employees of the employer within the U.S. or its territories are included for purposes of the total number of employees.
- An employer is considered a “small business” if it employs 10 or fewer
employees. This includes full-time, part-time, and temporary employees
including those provided through a temporary service or staffing agency or similar entity. - Once an employer employs 11 or more employees for 20 or more work weeks in the current or prior calendar year, the employer cannot be a “small business” again until it meets the requirements above.
When does an eligible employee begin to accrue earned sick time?
Small businesses will submit and obey Oct. 1, 2025, or upon commencement of the employee’s employment, whichever is later.
What notice must the employer provide to employees?
Sec. 8. (1) An employer subject to this act shall provide written notice to each employee at the time of hiring or not later than 30 days the effective date of the 2025 amendatory act that amended this section, whichever is later, including, but not limited to, all of the following:
- The amount of earned sick time required to be provided to an employee under this act.
- The employer’s choice of how to calculate a year as that term is defined under section 3.
- The terms under which earned sick time may be used.
- That retaliatory personnel action taken by the employer against an employee for requesting or using earned sick time for which the employee is eligible is prohibited.
- The employee’s right to file a complaint with the department for any violation of this act.
- The notice required under subsection (1) shall be in English, Spanish, and any language that
is the first language spoken by at least 10% of the employer’s workforce, if the department has translated the notice into that language.
This act does not require an employer to:
- Allow an employee to carry over any unused earned sick time from 1 year to the next year.
- Calculate and track an employee’s accrual of paid earned sick time.
- Pay the employee the value of the employee’s unused accrued paid earned sick time at the end of the year in which the earned sick time was accrued.
Read the February 2025 Update Here (PDF)
If you are charged with a crime
If you are charged with a crime you’re part of the State of Michigan family now. Your right to remain silent and request a lawyer exists as of the writing of this article.
So call us – Because you don’t want to be a part of that family.
Komorn Law (248) 357-2550
Other Posts
Sometimes our posts provide a general overview of things with opinionated sarcasm and dry humor by the writer to lighten the same old same old of other law sites. It does not substitute for legal advice. Anyone charged with a criminal offense should consult an attorney for specific legal guidance. BTW. True Fact: When Michael Komorn fights the justice system there is only one focus. You and your rights.
Recent
What does Nolle Prosequi mean?
What does Nolle Prosequi mean? Fatal Flaw In criminal cases, nolle prosequi may be employed when there is a significant weakness in the prosecution's case, when the prosecutor acknowledges an inability to prove the charges, or even when the prosecutor has lost...
People v. Lukity, 460 Mich 484 (1999)
Case Summary The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the defendant’s conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct against his fourteen‑year‑old daughter. The Court held that although one evidentiary error occurred, it was...
More
People v. Lukity, 460 Mich 484 (1999)
Case Summary The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the defendant’s conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct against his fourteen‑year‑old daughter. The Court held that although one evidentiary error occurred, it was...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Threat of Terrorism
Case Summary In People v Kvasnicka, the defendant sent a message to a young girl stating she “would not be laughing” when he came to her school to “shoot it up or blow it up like Columbine.” Charged under Michigan’s threat‑of‑terrorism statute, he argued the law was...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Prisoner in Possession
Prisoner in Possession of a Controlled SubstanceCase Summary In People v Tadgerson, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed a critical question: does the crime of a prisoner possessing a controlled substance under MCL 800.281(4) require proof of intent, or is it a...
What is Inference Stacking?
What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from building one inference on top of another when the first inference is not supported by direct evidence....
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Murder
Case Summary In People v Jones, the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed whether a single act of abuse can support convictions for both first‑degree child abuse and felony murder. The defendant argued that using the same conduct to support both charges violated...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Neglect of Duty
Case Summary In People v Harper, a Wayne County Sheriff’s deputy was charged with neglect of duty after witnessing an inmate escape during his smoke break and taking no action to stop or pursue the prisoner. The prosecution relied on the Sheriff’s Department policy...
















