Wrongful death suit against Disney serves as a warning to consumers when clicking ‘I agree’
A wrongful death lawsuit involving Walt Disney Parks and Resorts highlights the critical importance for consumers to meticulously review the fine print before registering for a streaming service or mobile application.
The family of a New York woman has filed a lawsuit following her tragic death after dining at a restaurant located in Disney Springs, a vibrant outdoor complex in Florida that offers a variety of dining, shopping, and entertainment options, all under the ownership of Disney.
Disney argues that the lawsuit should be dismissed based on the assertion that the plaintiff, the husband of the woman in question, previously signed up for a trial subscription to the Disney+ streaming service which they claim includes a subscriber agreement requiring customers to settle any legal disputes with Disney through arbitration instead of in court.
Such agreements, which users swiftly accept by clicking I agree while downloading an app or a streaming service, are often so biased against the consumer that providing sound legal advice can be quite challenging according to John Davisson, director of litigation at the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
If you agree click here
Legal Counsel and Your Rights
When facing legal challenges, particularly in criminal cases, it is advisable to seek legal counsel immediately.
An experienced attorney can provide guidance on how to navigate interactions with law enforcement while safeguarding your constitutional rights.
Since 1993 our expert legal defense in navigating criminal law matters and protecting your constitutional rights are what we eat for breakfast everyday.
Contact Komorn Law PLLC if you’re ready to fight and win.
Research us and then call us.
More Rights You Should Know
SCOTUS Decision Gives Starbucks a Win in Labor Dispute
The decision underscored the principle that only activities that are essential and directly related to an employee's primary job responsibilities are subject to compensation. In a recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Starbucks received a...
The 6th Amendment – Do You Know What It Is?
The 6th Amendment: is it still a thing?The 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution is a crucial pillar of the Bill of Rights, designed to ensure fair and just legal proceedings for individuals accused of crimes. Ratified on December 15, 1791, this amendment...
Other Articles
House Bill 5105 – The MRTMA Shuffle
Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit cannabis operations. Michigan’s Cannabis Laws Since Michigan legalized recreational marijuana in 2018, the state has worked to balance personal freedom with public...
Miranda v Arizona
Case Summary Miranda v. Arizona established that before police conduct custodial interrogation, they must advise suspects of their rights: the right to remain silent, that statements may be used against them, and the right to an attorney. These “Miranda warnings”...
Michigan Cannabis Tax Bill HB4951- Passed
In case you did not know...In September 2025, the Michigan Legislature passed House Bill 4951, known as the Comprehensive Road Funding Tax Act. This legislation introduces a significant change to the taxation of marijuana in Michigan, with implications for cannabis...
Don’t worry – There’s always a workaround
In case you did not know...The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that the smell of marijuana alone is no longer sufficient probable cause for police to conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle. This decision overturns a previous precedent where the odor of marijuana...
Seven News Story Summaries – September 2025 (Part 1)
Seven Summaries of Seven News StoriesGovernor Issues Executive Directive on AI Use in State Agencies Between September 1–15, 2025, the Governor of Michigan issued an executive directive regulating the use of artificial intelligence in state agencies. The directive...
Viridis Labs Barred from Michigan’s Cannabis Industry
The Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) has announced a landmark settlement, permanently banning three former law enforcement officials from participating in Michigan's cannabis market. The agreement mandates the immediate closure of Viridis Laboratories and its sister...
Appeals Court Reaffirms Strict One-Year Deadline for Suing the State of Michigan
Michigan Court of Appeals reiterated that there are no exceptions to the one-year deadline for filing lawsuits against the state of Michigan. Summary In a decision issued on July 30, 2025, the Michigan Court of Appeals reiterated that there are no exceptions to the...
Supreme Court Precedent Ignored by Lower Courts in Union Payment Cases
Should public employees retain the right to stop supporting a union, regardless of a prior written membership agreement, as guaranteed by the U.S. Supreme Court?In a concerning trend for individual worker rights, lower courts are reportedly ignoring a key U.S. Supreme...
