Wrongful death suit against Disney serves as a warning to consumers when clicking ‘I agree’
A wrongful death lawsuit involving Walt Disney Parks and Resorts highlights the critical importance for consumers to meticulously review the fine print before registering for a streaming service or mobile application.
The family of a New York woman has filed a lawsuit following her tragic death after dining at a restaurant located in Disney Springs, a vibrant outdoor complex in Florida that offers a variety of dining, shopping, and entertainment options, all under the ownership of Disney.
Disney argues that the lawsuit should be dismissed based on the assertion that the plaintiff, the husband of the woman in question, previously signed up for a trial subscription to the Disney+ streaming service which they claim includes a subscriber agreement requiring customers to settle any legal disputes with Disney through arbitration instead of in court.
Such agreements, which users swiftly accept by clicking I agree while downloading an app or a streaming service, are often so biased against the consumer that providing sound legal advice can be quite challenging according to John Davisson, director of litigation at the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
If you agree click here
Legal Counsel and Your Rights
When facing legal challenges, particularly in criminal cases, it is advisable to seek legal counsel immediately.
An experienced attorney can provide guidance on how to navigate interactions with law enforcement while safeguarding your constitutional rights.
Since 1993 our expert legal defense in navigating criminal law matters and protecting your constitutional rights are what we eat for breakfast everyday.
Contact Komorn Law PLLC if you’re ready to fight and win.
Research us and then call us.
More Rights You Should Know
The 6th Amendment – Do You Know What It Is?
The 6th Amendment: is it still a thing?The 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution is a crucial pillar of the Bill of Rights, designed to ensure fair and just legal proceedings for individuals accused of crimes. Ratified on December 15, 1791, this amendment...
The US Supreme Court and Federal Gun Law Cases
The US Supreme Court and Federal Gun Law CasesChallenges to Federal Gun Laws the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed Updated July 8, 2024 Ratified in 1791, the Second Amendment provides, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the...
Other Articles
Understanding Superintending Control in Michigan Courts
Sometimes, a higher court needs to step in to ensure a lower court is properly administering justice. This powerful action is called "superintending control."In Michigan, our court system is designed as a "One Court of Justice," meaning that while there are different...
MI COA Upholds Constitutionality of State’s Terrorist Threat Statute
The ruling means that prosecutors can continue to use this law as a vital tool in holding individuals accountable for making threats of terrorism, provided they can demonstrate the defendant acted recklessly in communicating the threat. The statute does not require...
Elder and Vulnerable Adult Financial Exploitation in Michigan
FAQs and Laws about Elder and Vulnerable Adult Financial ExploitationFinancial exploitation of elders and vulnerable adults is a growing and particularly insidious crime in Michigan, preying on individuals who, due to age, disability, or mental incapacity, are unable...
Sextortion and Sexploitation in Michigan
FAQs and Laws about Sextortion and SexploitationSextortion and sexploitation are increasingly prevalent and devastating forms of digital abuse, leveraging technology to coerce, manipulate, and exploit individuals, often for sexual gratification or financial gain....
Another look at People v Soto (MRTMA Defense Denied)
Another look at People v. Soto: Application of Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act to Felony ChargesMichigan's cannabis landscape is evolving rapidly, marked by a nuanced exploration of the People v. Soto case and its implications for the Michigan Regulation and...
MSC has ruled against extensive warrantless searches of cell phones.
The Michigan Supreme Court recently issued a significant ruling on August 1, 2025, limiting the ability of law enforcement to conduct broad, warrantless searches of cell phones during criminal investigations.Summary The Michigan Supreme Court recently issued a...
Michigan State Police Bust $10 Million Marijuana Grow
Sometimes, a higher court needs to step in to ensure a lower court is properly administering justice. This powerful action is called "superintending control."Lake County, MI – In a significant enforcement action, the Michigan State Police (MSP) recently seized over...
Extortion and Racketeering in Michigan
FAQs and Laws about Extortion and RacketeeringExtortion and racketeering represent serious criminal offenses in Michigan, targeting individuals who use threats, intimidation, or participate in organized criminal enterprises to obtain money, property, or undue...
