Is Oral Legal?
Verbal agreements, also called oral contracts, can be legal and enforceable in Michigan, but with some limitations.
Here’s a breakdown:
Generally Enforceable: Michigan law recognizes verbal contracts as valid if they meet the standard elements of a contract: offer, acceptance, and consideration (exchange of something of value).
Statute of Frauds: However, there’s a law called the Statute of Frauds that requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed to be enforceable.
These include:
- Agreements that won’t be performed within one year of making the agreement.
- Promises to answer for the debt of another person.
- Selling real estate.
- Selling goods for over $1,000.
Difficulties in Court: Even if your verbal agreement isn’t subject to the Statute of Frauds, it can be difficult to enforce in court. This is because there’s no written record of the agreement, so it becomes a “he-said, she-said” situation.
To Sum it Up: Verbal agreements can be legal in Michigan, but it’s always better to have a written contract, especially for important agreements. A written contract provides clear evidence of the terms and reduces the risk of misunderstandings or someone backing out of the agreement.
If you’re unsure whether your verbal agreement needs to be in writing or you need help enforcing a verbal agreement, it’s best to consult with an attorney.
What’s the law?
There isn’t a specific MCL dedicated solely to verbal agreements in Michigan. However, the relevant statute that applies to the enforceability of certain contracts based on form is the Statute of Frauds. This is found in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) under Article 2 on Sales:
- MCL 566.132 (https://www.legislature.mi.gov/)
This MCL outlines the types of contracts that must be in writing and signed to be enforceable in court. These include:
- Agreements that can’t be performed within one year (MCL 566.132(1)(a))
- Promises to guarantee another’s debt (MCL 566.132(1)(b))
Michigan’s UCC also has a separate provision under Article 2 for the sale of goods:
- MCL 440.2201 (http://legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-chap440.pdf)
This MCL requires any contract for the sale of goods for more than $1,000 to be in writing to be enforceable.
So, while there’s no single MCL for verbal agreements, these two provisions (MCL 566.132 and MCL 440.2201) are the key ones to consider when determining if a verbal agreement needs to be written down in Michigan.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I made a verbal agreement and shook hands with my friend for a $20 bet that he couldn’t eat a spoonful of cinnamon. He did. Am I legally obligated to pay him?
Answer: Some questions don’t need legal advice. Pay him the $20 and don’t bet anymore.
Related Articles
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
More Posts
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Michigan’s Evidence Rules 1001-1008
Michigan's Rules of Evidence, established by the Supreme Court, dictate how evidence is presented and admitted in court proceedings. Rules 1001 through 1008, focusing...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rules 901-903 Authenticating Evidence
Michigan Rules 901-903 - Evidence Authentication Ever wondered how that document or recording made its way into a Michigan courtroom? The answer lies in Michigan Rules...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 801-807 Hearsay Evidence
Michigan Rules of Evidence 801-807 Hearsay: In the courtroom, truth-finding is paramount. Yet, not every statement offered as evidence directly reveals the truth. Enter...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 701-707 Opinions
Opinions - Everyone's got one or two or three: A Look at Michigan Rules of Evidence 701-707 Lay Versus Expert Opinions (Rules 701 & 702) Before delving into...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 601-615 Witnesses
Navigating the Witness Box: A Look at Michigan Rules of Evidence 601-615 In the courtroom, witness testimony plays a crucial role in unveiling the truth and determining...
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall LANSING, MI -- A Michigan Court of Claims judge on Jan. 2 dismissed two lawsuits linked to Michigan’s...
Another city approves to deprioritize enforcement of psychedelics
Another city in Michigan has recently agreed to prioritize local enforcement of laws pertaining to psychedelic substances. Additionally, they have shown their...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 501 – Privilege in General
Rule 501. Privilege; General Rule. Privilege is governed by the common law, except as modified by statute or courtrule.Have your rights been violated?Have your driving...
Decision holding mandatory life without parole unconstitutional
COA 352569 PEOPLE OF MI V JOHN ANTONIO POOLE Opinion People v Poole (Docket No. 352569) decided January 18, 2024 The State Appellate Defender Office celebrates today’s...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: A Guide to Rules 401-411
Understanding the Foundation: A Summary of Michigan Rules of Evidence 401-411 The Michigan Rules of Evidence (MRE), specifically Rules 401-411, lay the groundwork for...