Is Oral Legal?
Verbal agreements, also called oral contracts, can be legal and enforceable in Michigan, but with some limitations.
Here’s a breakdown:
Generally Enforceable: Michigan law recognizes verbal contracts as valid if they meet the standard elements of a contract: offer, acceptance, and consideration (exchange of something of value).
Statute of Frauds: However, there’s a law called the Statute of Frauds that requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed to be enforceable.
These include:
- Agreements that won’t be performed within one year of making the agreement.
- Promises to answer for the debt of another person.
- Selling real estate.
- Selling goods for over $1,000.
Difficulties in Court: Even if your verbal agreement isn’t subject to the Statute of Frauds, it can be difficult to enforce in court. This is because there’s no written record of the agreement, so it becomes a “he-said, she-said” situation.
To Sum it Up: Verbal agreements can be legal in Michigan, but it’s always better to have a written contract, especially for important agreements. A written contract provides clear evidence of the terms and reduces the risk of misunderstandings or someone backing out of the agreement.
If you’re unsure whether your verbal agreement needs to be in writing or you need help enforcing a verbal agreement, it’s best to consult with an attorney.
What’s the law?
There isn’t a specific MCL dedicated solely to verbal agreements in Michigan. However, the relevant statute that applies to the enforceability of certain contracts based on form is the Statute of Frauds. This is found in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) under Article 2 on Sales:
- MCL 566.132 (https://www.legislature.mi.gov/)
This MCL outlines the types of contracts that must be in writing and signed to be enforceable in court. These include:
- Agreements that can’t be performed within one year (MCL 566.132(1)(a))
- Promises to guarantee another’s debt (MCL 566.132(1)(b))
Michigan’s UCC also has a separate provision under Article 2 for the sale of goods:
- MCL 440.2201 (http://legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-chap440.pdf)
This MCL requires any contract for the sale of goods for more than $1,000 to be in writing to be enforceable.
So, while there’s no single MCL for verbal agreements, these two provisions (MCL 566.132 and MCL 440.2201) are the key ones to consider when determining if a verbal agreement needs to be written down in Michigan.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I made a verbal agreement and shook hands with my friend for a $20 bet that he couldn’t eat a spoonful of cinnamon. He did. Am I legally obligated to pay him?
Answer: Some questions don’t need legal advice. Pay him the $20 and don’t bet anymore.
Related Articles
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Election Interference
Case Summary In People v Burkman, defendants created a robocall targeting African American voters during the 2020 election. The call falsely warned that mail‑in voting would expose voters to law‑enforcement tracking, debt collection, and forced vaccinations....
Court to Allow Challenge to Michigan’s New 24% Cannabis Tax
Summary A Michigan Court of Claims judge has ruled that the lawsuit challenging the state’s newly enacted 24% wholesale marijuana excise tax may proceed. The ruling, issued January 5, 2026, keeps alive a significant constitutional challenge brought by industry groups...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Arrest
People v Lyons, No 370840, ___ Mich App ___, ___ NW3d ___ (May 13, 2025)Case Summary In People v Lyons, the defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by police. Before the vehicle fully stopped, he exited and began walking away. Officers ordered him to return, he...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Manslaughter
Case Summary These two cases examine the boundaries of involuntary manslaughter. In People v Aiyash, a gas‑station clerk locked an agitated customer and three patrons inside the store, after which the customer shot the patrons. In People v Sherrill, the defendant...
More Posts
Michigan Court of Appeals Orders City of Taylor to Release Police Misconduct Records
Case Summary The Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that the City of Taylor must comply with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by the ACLU of...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Home Invasion
Case Summary In People v Berry, the defendant co‑owned a home with his former partner. After moving out and negotiating a buyout, he re‑entered the home with another...
Cannabis Regulators Association-Briefing on Marijuana Schedule Change
Overview of the President’s December 18th Executive Order and the Implications When Marijuana is Rescheduled to Schedule III under the U.S. Controlled Substances...
Trump’s Marijuana Reclassification 2025
Donald Trump’s Actions On December 18, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order reclassifying marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Felon in Possession
Case Summary In People v Hughes, the defendant challenged Michigan’s felon‑in‑possession statute on Second Amendment grounds. He argued the law was unconstitutional...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Controlled Substances
Case Summary In People v Soto (COA) the defendant faced a felony charge after an 85‑pound shipment of marijuana was delivered to her home. She argued that the Michigan...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Confessions
Case Summary Michigan courts issued several important decisions clarifying when confessions are admissible, how Miranda applies in nontraditional settings, and what...
Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — A Quick Summary
Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — Quick Summary The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, limiting when and how the...
Marijuana Under Fire in Michigan
Marijuana in Michigan is facing renewed challenges as lawmakers push for higher taxes and regulatory changes that critics argue undermine the voter-approved...
The New Federal Definition of Hemp
The New Federal Definition of Hemp: Legal and Regulatory ImplicationsCongress has enacted a sweeping revision to the federal definition of hemp through the Continuing...
























