Michigan Preliminary Exams
The Strategic Gatekeeper
in Felony Defense
A Guide to One of the Most Important Early Stages in a Felony Case
Summary
A preliminary examination (“prelim”) is the first major evidentiary hearing in a Michigan felony case. It is where a district court judge decides whether the prosecution has shown probable cause—a very low standard—that a crime occurred and that the defendant may have committed it. A bindover is the most common outcome, but the hearing remains strategically valuable. It allows the defense to cross‑examine witnesses, challenge weak evidence, preserve constitutional issues, and begin shaping the case long before trial.
Background
Every Michigan felony begins in district court. Before a case can move to circuit court, the prosecutor must present enough evidence to justify continuing the prosecution. At the preliminary exam, the judge must answer two questions:
-
Was a crime committed?
-
Is there probable cause to believe the defendant committed it?
If the answer to both is yes, the case is bound over to circuit court. If not, charges may be dismissed or reduced.
The standard of proof at this stage is probable cause, which is dramatically lower than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard required at trial. The uploaded document illustrates this difference by comparing probable cause to “approximately 3 on a scale of 0–100,” versus “90–93” for trial—an analogy meant only to show how low the bar is.
Opinions
From a defense perspective, the preliminary exam is one of the most important early opportunities to shape the case. Even when a bindover is expected, the hearing allows counsel to:
-
Cross‑examine witnesses under oath
-
Expose inconsistencies or gaps in memory
-
Challenge questionable evidence, including search‑and‑seizure issues
-
Lock in sworn testimony for impeachment at trial
-
Force the prosecution to reveal details not found in police reports
-
Build a record for later motions, including motions to suppress or quash the bindover
For example, in cases involving controlled substances—including marijuana—testimony at the prelim may reveal whether evidence was seized lawfully or whether statutory defenses might apply later.
What’s at Stake
The preliminary exam can influence the direction of the entire case:
-
Case Bound Over: The most common result; the case proceeds to circuit court.
-
Charges Dismissed: Rare, but possible if probable cause is not established.
-
Charges Reduced: The judge may find probable cause only for a lesser offense.
-
Adjournment: Occurs when witnesses are unavailable or discovery is incomplete.
-
Plea Agreement: Sometimes reached before or during the hearing.
A bindover is not a finding of guilt. It simply means the prosecution met the minimal threshold required to continue the case.
In Closing
The preliminary examination is not about winning or losing the case—it is about building the defense. At Komorn Law, the goal is to leave the hearing with a strong record: cross‑examination that exposes weaknesses, objections that preserve constitutional issues, and testimony that can be used later to challenge the prosecution’s case. As the document states, “The preliminary exam is the beginning of your defense — and we treat it with the seriousness it deserves.”
FAQs
Q: Is the preliminary exam the same as a trial?
A: No. The judge is not deciding guilt—only whether probable cause exists.
Q: Will I have to testify?
A: Almost never. Defendants typically do not testify at prelims.
Q: Can charges be dismissed at this stage?
A: Yes, but it is uncommon. Dismissal occurs only when the prosecution fails to meet the low probable‑cause standard.
Q: What if the police search was illegal?
A: Your attorney can begin raising Fourth Amendment issues at the prelim, preserving them for later motions.
Q: Why hold the prelim if the case will likely be bound over?
A: Because it provides sworn testimony, discovery advantages, and opportunities to challenge evidence that may shape the entire defense strategy.
Related Links & Sources
-
Michigan Court Rules – Preliminary Examinations (MCR 6.110)
-
Michigan Compiled Laws – Criminal Procedure
-
Michigan Controlled Substances Statutes (including PHC and MRTMA references)
-
Komorn Law PLLC – Criminal Defense Resources
Komorn Law, founded in 1993, brings decades of seasoned experience to Michigan’s most complex criminal and regulatory matters, including the evolving cannabis framework from the MMMA to today’s MRTMA landscape. The firm represents clients facing controlled‑substance offenses, DUI and drug‑related driving charges, firearm violations, property crimes, resisting or obstructing, and the most serious allegations such as manslaughter and homicide. With a proven record in courts across Michigan and the federal system, Komorn Law delivers strategic, relentless advocacy when the stakes are highest. To work with a firm that truly refuses to back down, call 248-357-2550.
More Articles
Michigan Court of Appeals Vacates Sentences in OWI‑3rd and Prisoner‑in‑Possession Case
Michigan Preliminary Exams The Strategic Gatekeeper in Felony Defense Convictions Upheld, But Panel Finds Sentences...
What is a Preliminary Exam?
Michigan Preliminary Examinations The Strategic Gatekeeper in Felony Defense The Preliminary Examination as the First...
What does Nolle Prosequi mean?
What does Nolle Prosequi mean? Fatal Flaw In criminal cases, nolle prosequi may be employed when there is a...
A Motion in Limine – What does it Mean?
Defininition and Explaination - Motion in LimineA motion in limine is a pretrial request asking the judge to exclude...
More
A Motion in Limine – What does it Mean?
Defininition and Explaination - Motion in LimineA motion in limine is a pretrial request asking the judge to exclude (or sometimes allow) specific evidence before the jury ever hears it. It’s one of the most important evidentiary tools in both criminal and civil...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Threat of Terrorism
Case Summary In People v Kvasnicka, the defendant sent a message to a young girl stating she “would not be laughing” when he came to her school to “shoot it up or blow it up like Columbine.” Charged under Michigan’s threat‑of‑terrorism statute, he argued the law was...
What is a Franks Hearing?
What is a Frank's Hearing?A Franks hearing is a critical legal tool used when a defendant claims that police lied, exaggerated, or recklessly disregarded the truth in a search warrant affidavit. When law enforcement places its hand on the Constitution, the law...
Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids
Taxed Again..? They're working on it.A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, and other internet‑connected devices marketed to or primarily used by minors. Lawmakers backing the proposal argue the...
Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms
The Shadow Cash Threat: Protecting the Integrity of Michigan Courtrooms In recent months, a spotlight has been cast on a hidden influence within the Michigan legal system: "shadow cash." This term refers to third-party litigation funding (TPLF), where outside...
Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults
No Good Headline to Lead with HereSummary Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with orchestrating a long‑running financial scheme that diverted funds from incapacitated adults under court‑appointed guardianship. The...
















