What to Expect at Your Preliminary Examination

Michigan Preliminary Exams

 The Strategic Gatekeeper
in Felony Defense

A Guide to One of the Most Important Early Stages in a Felony Case

Summary

A preliminary examination (“prelim”) is the first major evidentiary hearing in a Michigan felony case. It is where a district court judge decides whether the prosecution has shown probable cause—a very low standard—that a crime occurred and that the defendant may have committed it. A bindover is the most common outcome, but the hearing remains strategically valuable. It allows the defense to cross‑examine witnesses, challenge weak evidence, preserve constitutional issues, and begin shaping the case long before trial.

Background

Every Michigan felony begins in district court. Before a case can move to circuit court, the prosecutor must present enough evidence to justify continuing the prosecution. At the preliminary exam, the judge must answer two questions:

  • Was a crime committed?

  • Is there probable cause to believe the defendant committed it?

If the answer to both is yes, the case is bound over to circuit court. If not, charges may be dismissed or reduced.

The standard of proof at this stage is probable cause, which is dramatically lower than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard required at trial. The uploaded document illustrates this difference by comparing probable cause to “approximately 3 on a scale of 0–100,” versus “90–93” for trial—an analogy meant only to show how low the bar is.

Opinions

From a defense perspective, the preliminary exam is one of the most important early opportunities to shape the case. Even when a bindover is expected, the hearing allows counsel to:

  • Cross‑examine witnesses under oath

  • Expose inconsistencies or gaps in memory

  • Challenge questionable evidence, including search‑and‑seizure issues

  • Lock in sworn testimony for impeachment at trial

  • Force the prosecution to reveal details not found in police reports

  • Build a record for later motions, including motions to suppress or quash the bindover

For example, in cases involving controlled substances—including marijuana—testimony at the prelim may reveal whether evidence was seized lawfully or whether statutory defenses might apply later.

What’s at Stake

The preliminary exam can influence the direction of the entire case:

  • Case Bound Over: The most common result; the case proceeds to circuit court.

  • Charges Dismissed: Rare, but possible if probable cause is not established.

  • Charges Reduced: The judge may find probable cause only for a lesser offense.

  • Adjournment: Occurs when witnesses are unavailable or discovery is incomplete.

  • Plea Agreement: Sometimes reached before or during the hearing.

A bindover is not a finding of guilt. It simply means the prosecution met the minimal threshold required to continue the case.

In Closing

The preliminary examination is not about winning or losing the case—it is about building the defense. At Komorn Law, the goal is to leave the hearing with a strong record: cross‑examination that exposes weaknesses, objections that preserve constitutional issues, and testimony that can be used later to challenge the prosecution’s case. As the document states, “The preliminary exam is the beginning of your defense — and we treat it with the seriousness it deserves.”

FAQs

Q: Is the preliminary exam the same as a trial?

A: No. The judge is not deciding guilt—only whether probable cause exists.

Q: Will I have to testify?

A: Almost never. Defendants typically do not testify at prelims.

Q: Can charges be dismissed at this stage?

A: Yes, but it is uncommon. Dismissal occurs only when the prosecution fails to meet the low probable‑cause standard.

Q: What if the police search was illegal?

A: Your attorney can begin raising Fourth Amendment issues at the prelim, preserving them for later motions.

Q: Why hold the prelim if the case will likely be bound over?

A: Because it provides sworn testimony, discovery advantages, and opportunities to challenge evidence that may shape the entire defense strategy.

Related Links & Sources

  • Michigan Court Rules – Preliminary Examinations (MCR 6.110)

  • Michigan Compiled Laws – Criminal Procedure

  • Michigan Controlled Substances Statutes (including PHC and MRTMA references)

  • Komorn Law PLLC – Criminal Defense Resources

Komorn Law, founded in 1993, brings decades of seasoned experience to Michigan’s most complex criminal and regulatory matters, including the evolving cannabis framework from the MMMA to today’s MRTMA landscape. The firm represents clients facing controlled‑substance offenses, DUI and drug‑related driving charges, firearm violations, property crimes, resisting or obstructing, and the most serious allegations such as manslaughter and homicide. With a proven record in courts across Michigan and the federal system, Komorn Law delivers strategic, relentless advocacy when the stakes are highest. To work with a firm that truly refuses to back down, call  248-357-2550

More Articles

More

Trump’s Marijuana Reclassification 2025

Trump’s Marijuana Reclassification 2025

Donald Trump’s Actions On December 18, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order reclassifying marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This marks the most significant federal...

read more
Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — A Quick Summary

Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — A Quick Summary

Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — Quick Summary The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, limiting when and how the government may intrude on privacy. These protections apply only when police conduct qualifies as a search...

read more
Michael Komorn-Criminal Defense Attorney

About Your Attorney

Attorney Michael Komorn

Categories

Disclaimer: Please remember that the information provided in these legal tips and articles is for educational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or an agreement for legal services. Laws are subject to change, and interpretations can vary. While we strive for accuracy, legal information can be complex and may not apply to your specific situation. Reading this information does not establish an attorney-client relationship. It is crucial to consult with a qualified attorney to discuss the specific facts of your case before taking any action or making any decisions.

Other Topics

Driving Under the Influence

Michigan Laws FAQs

Your Rights

Michigan Supreme Court

Michigan Court of Appeals

Law Firm VIctories