Better Made vs. Cannabis Companies: A Michigan Trademark Dispute
Summary
Better Made, is embroiled in a legal battle with over a dozen cannabis businesses in the state. The lawsuit, filed in March 2024, centers on allegations of trademark infringement. Better Made claims a cannabis brand named “Better Smoke” is using a logo confusingly similar to their own, potentially misleading consumers and damaging their brand reputation.
Trademark Infringement Claims
Better Made asserts that the “Better Smoke” logo replicates key elements of their established trademark. This includes a similar design layout and potentially the use of a similar color scheme. The lawsuit argues that this similarity is likely to cause consumer confusion, leading people to believe the cannabis products are somehow affiliated with Better Made potato chips.


Protecting Brand Identity
The core of Better Made’s case rests on the concept of trademark infringement. Trademarks are symbols or designs that identify a specific source of goods or services. By establishing a trademark, companies gain legal protection against others using confusingly similar marks that could mislead consumers.
Dangers of Dilution
Beyond simply avoiding confusion, Better Made also claims trademark dilution. This legal concept protects against uses that weaken the distinctiveness of a brand, even if there’s no immediate confusion. In this case, Better Made argues that the “Better Smoke” brand chips away at the unique identity they’ve built for their own products.
Legal Repercussions
Better Made seeks both monetary damages and an injunction. An injunction is a court order prohibiting the defendants from using the allegedly infringing logo. If successful, this could force the “Better Smoke” brand to redesign its packaging and marketing materials.
The Road Ahead
The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely watched by businesses in both the food and cannabis industries. A win for Better Made could set a precedent for how established brands can protect themselves from potential confusion caused by cannabis businesses using similar names or logos.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I smoked several joints and consumed too many marijuana edibles at a concert in the park. Is that legal??
Answer: If it was not a state licensed consumption event the answer is no. It is unlawful to smoke marijuana in public places. The Gov needs to get their cut.
333.27954 Scope of act; unauthorized activities with marihuana and marihuana accessories; limitations; application of privileges, rights, immunities, and defenses under other marihuana laws; employer rights; property owner rights.
Sec. 4. 1. This act does not authorize:
(e) consuming marihuana in a public place or smoking marihuana where prohibited by the person who owns, occupies, or manages the property, except for purposes of this subdivision a public place does not include an area designated for consumption within a municipality that has authorized consumption in designated areas that are not accessible to persons under 21 years of age;
Read the Law
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-Initiated-Law-1-of-2018.pdf
Related Articles
DEA – AG Miss Deadline to Respond on Cannabis Rescheduling
The Drug Enforcement Administration persists in maintaining secrecy around their process, disregarding a congressional request for transparency.Never Ending StoryThe Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Attorney General Merrick Garland missed a Feb. 12 deadline...
CRA Executive Director Hanna Applauds Whitmer’s FY25 Budget
No Evidence of Widespread Discriminatory Policing PracticesNever Ending Quest February 15, 2024 LANSING, MI – Today, Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) Executive Director Brian Hanna applauded Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Executive Budget...
Cannabis Tax Payments Being Distributed in Michigan
Adult-Use Marijuana Tax Payments Being Distributed In MichiganHere's what they say...Treasury: Adult-Use Marijuana Payments Being Distributed to Michigan Municipalities and Counties; More Than $59.5 Million Going to 224 Municipalities and Counties. Sales of "legal"...
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall LANSING, MI -- A Michigan Court of Claims judge on Jan. 2 dismissed two lawsuits linked to Michigan’s enormous 64,000-pound, $229 million 2021 marijuana recall that impacted an estimated 60% of all...
More Posts
Michigan Supreme Court to Hold Public Administrative Hearing
On September 18, 2024, the Michigan Supreme Court will conduct a public administrative hearing,...
Nuclear waste headed to southeast Michigan landfill
What happened to the nuclear waste from the Manhattan Project? It's coming to Michigan so New York...
Video kept from family shows police force not drugs killed son
police and paramedics inflicted “inhumane acts of violence”A mother has filed a federal lawsuit...
What could happen when you click the – I agree – box?
Wrongful death suit against Disney serves as a warning to consumers when clicking ‘I agree’A...
4th Circuit says – Assault weapons can be banned
This case is about whether the Act’s general prohibition on the sale and possession of certain...
Court Ruling – No bonus for growing weed
COURT RULING – SORRY NO BONUS FOR GROWING CANNABISA marijuana farm worker is unable to succeed in...
SCOTUS – Justices uphold laws targeting homelessness
Does not amount to “cruel and unusual punishment” under the Eighth Amendment The Supreme Court has...
Michigan Crime Victim Compensation
Michigan has a crime victim compensation fund. You can contact them using the various links on...
The Takings Clauses of the United States and Michigan
These clauses protect property rights and maintain a balance between public needs and individual...
Michigan Supreme Court – People of Michigan v. Duff
A seizure may occur when a police vehicle partially blocks a defendant’s egress if thetotality of...