Better Made vs. Cannabis Companies: A Michigan Trademark Dispute
Summary
Better Made, is embroiled in a legal battle with over a dozen cannabis businesses in the state. The lawsuit, filed in March 2024, centers on allegations of trademark infringement. Better Made claims a cannabis brand named “Better Smoke” is using a logo confusingly similar to their own, potentially misleading consumers and damaging their brand reputation.
Trademark Infringement Claims
Better Made asserts that the “Better Smoke” logo replicates key elements of their established trademark. This includes a similar design layout and potentially the use of a similar color scheme. The lawsuit argues that this similarity is likely to cause consumer confusion, leading people to believe the cannabis products are somehow affiliated with Better Made potato chips.
Protecting Brand Identity
The core of Better Made’s case rests on the concept of trademark infringement. Trademarks are symbols or designs that identify a specific source of goods or services. By establishing a trademark, companies gain legal protection against others using confusingly similar marks that could mislead consumers.
Dangers of Dilution
Beyond simply avoiding confusion, Better Made also claims trademark dilution. This legal concept protects against uses that weaken the distinctiveness of a brand, even if there’s no immediate confusion. In this case, Better Made argues that the “Better Smoke” brand chips away at the unique identity they’ve built for their own products.
Legal Repercussions
Better Made seeks both monetary damages and an injunction. An injunction is a court order prohibiting the defendants from using the allegedly infringing logo. If successful, this could force the “Better Smoke” brand to redesign its packaging and marketing materials.
The Road Ahead
The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely watched by businesses in both the food and cannabis industries. A win for Better Made could set a precedent for how established brands can protect themselves from potential confusion caused by cannabis businesses using similar names or logos.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I smoked several joints and consumed too many marijuana edibles at a concert in the park. Is that legal??
Answer: If it was not a state licensed consumption event the answer is no. It is unlawful to smoke marijuana in public places. The Gov needs to get their cut.
333.27954 Scope of act; unauthorized activities with marihuana and marihuana accessories; limitations; application of privileges, rights, immunities, and defenses under other marihuana laws; employer rights; property owner rights.
Sec. 4. 1. This act does not authorize:
(e) consuming marihuana in a public place or smoking marihuana where prohibited by the person who owns, occupies, or manages the property, except for purposes of this subdivision a public place does not include an area designated for consumption within a municipality that has authorized consumption in designated areas that are not accessible to persons under 21 years of age;
Read the Law
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-Initiated-Law-1-of-2018.pdf
Related Articles
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
More Posts
Michigan’s public employees are protected by government immunity for bad decisions
Sorry...Not SorryMichigan Governmental Immunity Laws Michigan’s governmental immunity laws provide...
This drug will eat your flesh turn your skin green and it’s in Michigan
This illicit drug will eat your flesh, turn your skin green, scaly and it's in MichiganWe did not...
$700 Million Settlement Against Johnson and Johnson – What’s Your Cut?
Attorney General Nessel Reaches $700 Million Settlement Against Johnson and JohnsonYour mom and...
I got a DUI while driving my dad’s boat – Will they take it?
I was out driving my dad's boat on the lake and I got caught drinking. Can they take the boat away...
Seattle settles case involving – the rights of nature
The Rights of NatureSeattle settled a lawsuit brought by the Sauk-Suiattle Tribe on behalf of...
NY judge fines unlicensed cannabis shops $15 million
It's their corner now“This punishment should serve as a clear warning for all unlicensed cannabis...
When Cannabis Businesses Are No Longer Subject to IRS 280E
IRS 280E and Cannabis BusinessesWhat is IRS Section 280E? Section 280E of the Internal Revenue...
I am going to Canada – Can I bring my cannabis?
Borders and Cannabis and MoneyFerengi Rule of Acquisition #41. Profit is its own reward.If you...
Squatters in Michigan
SquattersSquatting, in one definition is the unauthorized occupation of a property, can be a...
Vehicle Forfeiture in Canada – The Process of Taking
Thank You... and have a nice day eh!Disclaimer: We are not Attorneys in Canada. This is an...