Better Made vs. Cannabis Companies: A Michigan Trademark Dispute
Summary
Better Made, is embroiled in a legal battle with over a dozen cannabis businesses in the state. The lawsuit, filed in March 2024, centers on allegations of trademark infringement. Better Made claims a cannabis brand named “Better Smoke” is using a logo confusingly similar to their own, potentially misleading consumers and damaging their brand reputation.
Trademark Infringement Claims
Better Made asserts that the “Better Smoke” logo replicates key elements of their established trademark. This includes a similar design layout and potentially the use of a similar color scheme. The lawsuit argues that this similarity is likely to cause consumer confusion, leading people to believe the cannabis products are somehow affiliated with Better Made potato chips.


Protecting Brand Identity
The core of Better Made’s case rests on the concept of trademark infringement. Trademarks are symbols or designs that identify a specific source of goods or services. By establishing a trademark, companies gain legal protection against others using confusingly similar marks that could mislead consumers.
Dangers of Dilution
Beyond simply avoiding confusion, Better Made also claims trademark dilution. This legal concept protects against uses that weaken the distinctiveness of a brand, even if there’s no immediate confusion. In this case, Better Made argues that the “Better Smoke” brand chips away at the unique identity they’ve built for their own products.
Legal Repercussions
Better Made seeks both monetary damages and an injunction. An injunction is a court order prohibiting the defendants from using the allegedly infringing logo. If successful, this could force the “Better Smoke” brand to redesign its packaging and marketing materials.
The Road Ahead
The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely watched by businesses in both the food and cannabis industries. A win for Better Made could set a precedent for how established brands can protect themselves from potential confusion caused by cannabis businesses using similar names or logos.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I smoked several joints and consumed too many marijuana edibles at a concert in the park. Is that legal??
Answer: If it was not a state licensed consumption event the answer is no. It is unlawful to smoke marijuana in public places. The Gov needs to get their cut.
333.27954 Scope of act; unauthorized activities with marihuana and marihuana accessories; limitations; application of privileges, rights, immunities, and defenses under other marihuana laws; employer rights; property owner rights.
Sec. 4. 1. This act does not authorize:
(e) consuming marihuana in a public place or smoking marihuana where prohibited by the person who owns, occupies, or manages the property, except for purposes of this subdivision a public place does not include an area designated for consumption within a municipality that has authorized consumption in designated areas that are not accessible to persons under 21 years of age;
Read the Law
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-Initiated-Law-1-of-2018.pdf
Related Articles
Michigan marijuana testing lab says potency results are legit
Controversial Michigan marijuana testing lab says potency results are legit. IT HAS PROOF! Michigan regulators and the state’s largest marijuana safety testing lab are at odds. When customers purchase marijuana off shelves, the Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) has...
Super potent weed spurs distrust in Michigan marijuana industry
In case you missed it... The validity of results issued by marijuana safety labs in Michigan and across the nation have been called into question. There are allegations of labs intentionally issuing higher THC potency test results -- which makes the marijuana more...
Judge limits Michigan marijuana recall to half the product initially covered
A marijuana recall will proceed in part after a judge denied a testing company's request for a preliminary injunction for a recall of products tested by one of its labs, but allowed it for the other. The split decision from Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher...
Michigan lab fights back in court after marijuana recall
A marijuana lab licensed in Michigan is suing the Marijuana Regulatory Agency (MRA) over a recall that impacted nearly $230 million worth and 64,000 pounds of marijuana products in the state. Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher M. Murray on Monday appeared to...
More Posts
The MSP is Concerned About Your Privacy (Vehicle Information)
Is the Michigan State Police really concerned about your Driver License and Motor Vehicle...
The MSP is Concerned About Your Privacy (Biometric Information)
Is the Michigan State Police really concerned about your DNA / biometric privacy?Here's what they...
The MSP and Your Privacy (Criminal History)
Is the Michigan State Police really concerned about your criminal history privacy?Here's what they...
Michigan DNA Collection – The Law
Chapter 750Act 328 of 1931328-1931-LXXVI THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)Act 328 of 1931Here's...
The 6th Amendment – Do You Know What It Is?
The 6th Amendment: is it still a thing?The 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution is a...
The US Supreme Court and Federal Gun Law Cases
The US Supreme Court and Federal Gun Law CasesChallenges to Federal Gun Laws the right of the...
Do Passengers in a Vehicle have 4th Amendment Rights?
Do Passengers have 4th Amendment Rights?Michigan Supreme Court Limits Police Ability to Search...
Michigan Appeals Court Decision on Cannabis Use and Probation
Michigan Court of Appeals - Recreational Cannabis Use and ProbationRecently, another pivotal...
Do Students Have 4th Amendment Rights in Schools
Students and 4th Amendment RightsStudents are entitled to a right to be safe from unreasonable...
Forfeiture Law: SCOTUS and Sixth Circuit Issue Landmark Rulings
Forfeiture Law in Focus: SCOTUS and Sixth Circuit Issue Landmark RulingsThe landscape of...