Better Made vs. Cannabis Companies: A Michigan Trademark Dispute
Summary
Better Made, is embroiled in a legal battle with over a dozen cannabis businesses in the state. The lawsuit, filed in March 2024, centers on allegations of trademark infringement. Better Made claims a cannabis brand named “Better Smoke” is using a logo confusingly similar to their own, potentially misleading consumers and damaging their brand reputation.
Trademark Infringement Claims
Better Made asserts that the “Better Smoke” logo replicates key elements of their established trademark. This includes a similar design layout and potentially the use of a similar color scheme. The lawsuit argues that this similarity is likely to cause consumer confusion, leading people to believe the cannabis products are somehow affiliated with Better Made potato chips.


Protecting Brand Identity
The core of Better Made’s case rests on the concept of trademark infringement. Trademarks are symbols or designs that identify a specific source of goods or services. By establishing a trademark, companies gain legal protection against others using confusingly similar marks that could mislead consumers.
Dangers of Dilution
Beyond simply avoiding confusion, Better Made also claims trademark dilution. This legal concept protects against uses that weaken the distinctiveness of a brand, even if there’s no immediate confusion. In this case, Better Made argues that the “Better Smoke” brand chips away at the unique identity they’ve built for their own products.
Legal Repercussions
Better Made seeks both monetary damages and an injunction. An injunction is a court order prohibiting the defendants from using the allegedly infringing logo. If successful, this could force the “Better Smoke” brand to redesign its packaging and marketing materials.
The Road Ahead
The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely watched by businesses in both the food and cannabis industries. A win for Better Made could set a precedent for how established brands can protect themselves from potential confusion caused by cannabis businesses using similar names or logos.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I smoked several joints and consumed too many marijuana edibles at a concert in the park. Is that legal??
Answer: If it was not a state licensed consumption event the answer is no. It is unlawful to smoke marijuana in public places. The Gov needs to get their cut.
333.27954 Scope of act; unauthorized activities with marihuana and marihuana accessories; limitations; application of privileges, rights, immunities, and defenses under other marihuana laws; employer rights; property owner rights.
Sec. 4. 1. This act does not authorize:
(e) consuming marihuana in a public place or smoking marihuana where prohibited by the person who owns, occupies, or manages the property, except for purposes of this subdivision a public place does not include an area designated for consumption within a municipality that has authorized consumption in designated areas that are not accessible to persons under 21 years of age;
Read the Law
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-Initiated-Law-1-of-2018.pdf
Related Articles
New Michigan Laws Going Into Effect 2025
Making laws as fast as possible. Look over here...Not over there.Some of Michigan's new laws in 2025 include minimum wage increases, paid sick time, and automatic voter registration. Minimum wage The minimum wage in Michigan increased to $10.56 per hour on January 1,...
Whitmer’s $3B plan to fix Michigan’s roads calls for more taxes
Same Thing - Different DayWhitmer's $3B plan to fix Michigan roads calls for more corporate, marijuana taxes, taxes at the pump and you can just imagine the ones you don't know about.Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer has introduced a comprehensive three billion...
Making terrorist threat or false report of terrorism is free speech?
Making terrorist threat or false report of terrorism is free speech?The US Constitution and Michigan Constitution prohibit the government from making laws that abridge the freedom of speech Summary In the case of People of the State of Michigan v. Michael Joseph...
Qualifying for a Public Defender in Michigan
In Michigan, individuals charged with a crime have the constitutional right to legal representation.In Michigan, individuals charged with a crime have the constitutional right to legal representation. For those unable to afford a private attorney, the state provides...
More Posts
Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan
Komorn Law - Quick Legal TipsLegal Tip: Understanding Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan A...
How to create and share a Dropbox link
Simplified Sender and Receiver Dropbox Share Instructions to Someone NOT on your Team. Don't get...
Smell of marijuana no longer legal grounds for search
The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that the smell of marijuana alone is no longer sufficient...
Michigan Forfeiture News Articles
Can the police sieze your belongings and hold it without charging you with a crime?Civil asset...
What Happens When the Government Takes Your Property?
Can the police sieze your belongings and hold it without charging you with a crime?Forfeiture laws...
Defending Against Criminal Sex Charges
Defense against false accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in MichiganDefending against a...
Forfeiture without Criminal Charges
Can the police seize your belongings and hold it without charging you with a crime?Read the...
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) – Michigan
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan: Definitions, Penalties, and Legal References.Criminal...
23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and your data is?
As of Friday 3/28/25, the firm’s shares were worth less than a dollar.If you are charged with a...
Michigan Supreme Court Vacates Court of Appeals Ruling of State Anti-Terror Statute
Michigan Supreme Court Vacates Court of Appeals Ruling, Temporarily Preserves State Anti-Terror...