Better Made vs. Cannabis Companies: A Michigan Trademark Dispute
Summary
Better Made, is embroiled in a legal battle with over a dozen cannabis businesses in the state. The lawsuit, filed in March 2024, centers on allegations of trademark infringement. Better Made claims a cannabis brand named “Better Smoke” is using a logo confusingly similar to their own, potentially misleading consumers and damaging their brand reputation.
Trademark Infringement Claims
Better Made asserts that the “Better Smoke” logo replicates key elements of their established trademark. This includes a similar design layout and potentially the use of a similar color scheme. The lawsuit argues that this similarity is likely to cause consumer confusion, leading people to believe the cannabis products are somehow affiliated with Better Made potato chips.
Protecting Brand Identity
The core of Better Made’s case rests on the concept of trademark infringement. Trademarks are symbols or designs that identify a specific source of goods or services. By establishing a trademark, companies gain legal protection against others using confusingly similar marks that could mislead consumers.
Dangers of Dilution
Beyond simply avoiding confusion, Better Made also claims trademark dilution. This legal concept protects against uses that weaken the distinctiveness of a brand, even if there’s no immediate confusion. In this case, Better Made argues that the “Better Smoke” brand chips away at the unique identity they’ve built for their own products.
Legal Repercussions
Better Made seeks both monetary damages and an injunction. An injunction is a court order prohibiting the defendants from using the allegedly infringing logo. If successful, this could force the “Better Smoke” brand to redesign its packaging and marketing materials.
The Road Ahead
The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely watched by businesses in both the food and cannabis industries. A win for Better Made could set a precedent for how established brands can protect themselves from potential confusion caused by cannabis businesses using similar names or logos.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I smoked several joints and consumed too many marijuana edibles at a concert in the park. Is that legal??
Answer: If it was not a state licensed consumption event the answer is no. It is unlawful to smoke marijuana in public places. The Gov needs to get their cut.
333.27954 Scope of act; unauthorized activities with marihuana and marihuana accessories; limitations; application of privileges, rights, immunities, and defenses under other marihuana laws; employer rights; property owner rights.
Sec. 4. 1. This act does not authorize:
(e) consuming marihuana in a public place or smoking marihuana where prohibited by the person who owns, occupies, or manages the property, except for purposes of this subdivision a public place does not include an area designated for consumption within a municipality that has authorized consumption in designated areas that are not accessible to persons under 21 years of age;
Read the Law
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-Initiated-Law-1-of-2018.pdf
Related Articles
Michigan’s Pot Problem: Woman Faces Prison, Major Grower Released
Tale of Two Cases - Maybe ThreeExamining Justice in Michigan's Cannabis Landscape Michigan's progressive stance on cannabis, marked by the legalization of both medical and recreational marijuana, has been lauded as a significant step forward. However, recent...
Oakland County Judge Faces Judicial Tenure Complaint
Oakland County Judge Faces Judicial Tenure Complaint After Removal from Felony CasesAn Oakland County District Court judge, Kristen Hartig of Troy's 52-4 District Court, is now facing a formal complaint from the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) following her...
Judicial Accountability in Michigan for Judges
Maintaining public trust in the judiciary is paramount to a functioning legal system. In Michigan, several mechanisms exist to ensure judicial accountability, holding judges responsible for their conduct both on and off the bench. These safeguards are primarily...
Michigan lawmakers want to revive “junk science” roadside drug testing
The Roadside Drug Test...AgainHouse bills 4390 and 4391The proposed House bills 4390 and 4391 would enable law enforcement to administer tests aimed at assessing driver impairment; however, these testing devices do not provide information regarding the level of...
More Posts
Should courts allow prosecutors to refer to complainants as victims
Labeling before adjudication. Kedero Treasvant was convicted of multiple firearm-related offenses...
Improper Transport of a Firearm in Michigan
Improper Firearms Transport, Storage Laws and Penalties Michigan law makes improper gun transport...
Supreme Court to Hear Case on Gun Rights and Marijuana Use
Supreme Court to Hear Case on Gun Rights and Marijuana Use The Supreme Court has agreed to hear...
House Bill 5107 – The MRTMA Shuffle
Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit...
House Bill 5105 – The MRTMA Shuffle
Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit...
Miranda v Arizona
Case Summary Miranda v. Arizona established that before police conduct custodial interrogation,...
Michigan Cannabis Tax Bill HB4951- Passed
In case you did not know...In September 2025, the Michigan Legislature passed House Bill 4951,...
Don’t worry – There’s always a workaround
In case you did not know...The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that the smell of marijuana alone...
Seven News Story Summaries – September 2025 (Part 1)
Seven Summaries of Seven News StoriesGovernor Issues Executive Directive on AI Use in State...
Viridis Labs Barred from Michigan’s Cannabis Industry
The Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) has announced a landmark settlement, permanently banning...























