Better Made vs. Cannabis Companies: A Michigan Trademark Dispute
Summary
Better Made, is embroiled in a legal battle with over a dozen cannabis businesses in the state. The lawsuit, filed in March 2024, centers on allegations of trademark infringement. Better Made claims a cannabis brand named “Better Smoke” is using a logo confusingly similar to their own, potentially misleading consumers and damaging their brand reputation.
Trademark Infringement Claims
Better Made asserts that the “Better Smoke” logo replicates key elements of their established trademark. This includes a similar design layout and potentially the use of a similar color scheme. The lawsuit argues that this similarity is likely to cause consumer confusion, leading people to believe the cannabis products are somehow affiliated with Better Made potato chips.


Protecting Brand Identity
The core of Better Made’s case rests on the concept of trademark infringement. Trademarks are symbols or designs that identify a specific source of goods or services. By establishing a trademark, companies gain legal protection against others using confusingly similar marks that could mislead consumers.
Dangers of Dilution
Beyond simply avoiding confusion, Better Made also claims trademark dilution. This legal concept protects against uses that weaken the distinctiveness of a brand, even if there’s no immediate confusion. In this case, Better Made argues that the “Better Smoke” brand chips away at the unique identity they’ve built for their own products.
Legal Repercussions
Better Made seeks both monetary damages and an injunction. An injunction is a court order prohibiting the defendants from using the allegedly infringing logo. If successful, this could force the “Better Smoke” brand to redesign its packaging and marketing materials.
The Road Ahead
The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely watched by businesses in both the food and cannabis industries. A win for Better Made could set a precedent for how established brands can protect themselves from potential confusion caused by cannabis businesses using similar names or logos.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I smoked several joints and consumed too many marijuana edibles at a concert in the park. Is that legal??
Answer: If it was not a state licensed consumption event the answer is no. It is unlawful to smoke marijuana in public places. The Gov needs to get their cut.
333.27954 Scope of act; unauthorized activities with marihuana and marihuana accessories; limitations; application of privileges, rights, immunities, and defenses under other marihuana laws; employer rights; property owner rights.
Sec. 4. 1. This act does not authorize:
(e) consuming marihuana in a public place or smoking marihuana where prohibited by the person who owns, occupies, or manages the property, except for purposes of this subdivision a public place does not include an area designated for consumption within a municipality that has authorized consumption in designated areas that are not accessible to persons under 21 years of age;
Read the Law
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-Initiated-Law-1-of-2018.pdf
Related Articles
John Sinclair, the inspiration for Ann Arbor’s Hash Bash, dead at 82
John Sinclair, the poet whose imprisonment for marijuana inspired the start of Ann Arbor’s long-running annual Hash Bash in the 1970s, has died. He was 82.Sinclair's passing occurred on Tuesday, April 2, 2024, at a Detroit hospital, merely four days prior to his...
Woman high on cannabis panics and jumps from rideshare on I-96
Not a good ideaA woman, who was allegedly under the influence of cannabis, experienced a moment of panic while riding in a rideshare vehicle. In a concerning turn of events, she chose to abruptly exit the moving vehicle on I-96 near I-94, according to reports from...
Senate considers bill making governor, lawmakers eligible for FOIA
Why this was not a thing and passed decades ago would be a good question.The Senate oversight committee will review a bill that aims to extend Michigan's Freedom of Information Act to cover lawmakers and the governor's office. Senate Bills 669 and 670 aim to expand...
Whitmer supports opt-out system for state park passes
Whitmer expressed her support in her 2025 budget recommendations for legislation that would automatically charge vehicle owners a fee for entry to state parks. Another fine piece of legislation introduced House Bill 5428, which would automatically take from vehicle...
More Posts
Can I sue for being falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct
If you are innocent and falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan can you...
Resisting Arrest in Michigan
Stop resisting! Stop resisting!In Michigan, resisting arrest is a serious crime. Under Michigan...
Probable Cause v Reasonable Suspicion
What's the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion?Definition of Probable Cause...
False accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan
False accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) are a serious.False accusations of Criminal...
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) Consent in Michigan
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) Consent in Michigan: Definitions, Penalties, and Legal...
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) Fourth Degree
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan: Fourth DegreeCriminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) is a set of...
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) Third Degree
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan Third DegreeCriminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) is a set of...
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) Second Degree
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan: Definitions, Penalties, and Legal References.Criminal...
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) First Degree
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan: First DegreeCriminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) is a set of...
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) – Michigan
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan: Definitions, Penalties, and Legal References.Criminal...