Charge with involuntary manslaughter for stopping thief.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
V.
HASSAN WALID AIYASH
Case Summary:
This case revolves around a gas station attendant who was charged with involuntary manslaughter after a patron was fatally shot inside the store. The attendant remotely locked the store’s door after the patron attempted to leave without paying. The patron became agitated and shot three people, killing one.
Short Background
Samuel McCray went into a Detroit gas station around three o’clock in the morning on May 6, 2023, and tried to buy about four dollars’ worth of snacks and beverages.
Defendant was working as the gas-station attendant at the time. After McCray’s card was declined, McCray threatened to kill defendant and tried to leave with the unpaid-for merchandise.
Defendant stopped McCray by remotely locking the gas station’s only door, trapping McCray and three other patrons inside the gas-station store.
Standing behind bulletproof glass, defendant mocked McCray while the other three patrons pleaded with defendant to unlock the door.
Defendant initially refused, allowing the situation in the store to escalate for several minutes before finally unlocking the door.
But by that time, it was too late—McCray believed that one of the other patrons, Gregory Kelly, had insulted him, so McCray took out a gun and shot Kelly nine times, killing him.
McCray shot another patron, David Langston, three times, and the third patron, Anthony Bowden, three or four times.
On these facts, the prosecution seeks to hold defendant criminally liable for Kelly’s death under a theory of involuntary manslaughter.
The district court bound defendant over on the charge, and the circuit court affirmed.
Full story link and court opinion at end of this article.
Legal Issue:
The primary legal question is whether the attendant’s actions were the proximate cause of the death. Proximate cause requires a reasonably foreseeable link between the defendant’s actions and the harm.
Prosecution’s Argument:
The prosecution argued that the attendant’s actions escalated the situation and led to the shooting, making him liable. The lower court agreed.
Use You Right To Remain Silent
If you have been accused or charged with a crime.
Say nothing to anyone. Talk to us first.
Our firm is experienced in both State and Federal courts defending clients.
CALL NOW
Court of Appeals’ Ruling:
The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed, finding that the patron’s intentional actions were not reasonably foreseeable. The court noted that the attendant had no prior knowledge of the patron’s dangerousness.
Comparison to People v. Crumbley:
The court contrasted this case with People v. Crumbley, where parents were held liable for their son’s school shooting because they knew of his mental health issues and gave him access to a gun.
Importance of the Case:
This case highlights the strict standards for proximate cause in criminal cases, particularly involving third-party actions. It emphasizes that mere escalation of a situation does not automatically lead to criminal liability for unforeseeable violence. The decision also illustrates the court’s caution in expanding criminal liability for third-party actions.
Read full detailed story and court opinion here
Charged with Involuntary Manslaughter for Stopping Thief 20240925_C369689_31_369689.opn.CAO
Note: This article provides a general overview and does not substitute for legal advice. Anyone charged with a crime should consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.
Related Articles
What does Nolle Prosequi mean?
What does Nolle Prosequi mean? Fatal Flaw In criminal cases, nolle prosequi may be employed when there is a significant weakness in the prosecution's case, when the prosecutor acknowledges an inability to prove the charges, or even when the prosecutor has lost...
People v. Lukity, 460 Mich 484 (1999)
Case Summary The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the defendant’s conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct against his fourteen‑year‑old daughter. The Court held that although one evidentiary error occurred, it was...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Threat of Terrorism
Case Summary In People v Kvasnicka, the defendant sent a message to a young girl stating she “would not be laughing” when he came to her school to “shoot it up or blow it up like Columbine.” Charged under Michigan’s threat‑of‑terrorism statute, he argued the law was...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Prisoner in Possession
Prisoner in Possession of a Controlled SubstanceCase Summary In People v Tadgerson, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed a critical question: does the crime of a prisoner possessing a controlled substance under MCL 800.281(4) require proof of intent, or is it a...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Murder
Case Summary In People v Jones, the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed whether a single act of abuse can support convictions for both first‑degree child abuse and felony murder. The defendant argued that using the same conduct to support both charges violated...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Neglect of Duty
Case Summary In People v Harper, a Wayne County Sheriff’s deputy was charged with neglect of duty after witnessing an inmate escape during his smoke break and taking no action to stop or pursue the prisoner. The prosecution relied on the Sheriff’s Department policy...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Metallic Knuckles
Case Summary In People v Dummer, the defendant challenged Michigan’s metallic‑knuckles statute, arguing that simply possessing the weapon was protected by the Second Amendment. The Michigan Court of Appeals acknowledged that possession of metallic knuckles is...
Court to Allow Challenge to Michigan’s New 24% Cannabis Tax
Summary A Michigan Court of Claims judge has ruled that the lawsuit challenging the state’s newly enacted 24% wholesale marijuana excise tax may proceed. The ruling, issued January 5, 2026, keeps alive a significant constitutional challenge brought by industry groups...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Arrest
People v Lyons, No 370840, ___ Mich App ___, ___ NW3d ___ (May 13, 2025)Case Summary In People v Lyons, the defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by police. Before the vehicle fully stopped, he exited and began walking away. Officers ordered him to return, he...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Appeal
Michigan appellate courts issued several significant decisions refining how convictions are reviewed, when relief from judgment is appropriate, and how procedural errors must be preserved. These cases collectively clarify retroactivity, evidentiary‑weight standards,...
