Michigan Rules of Evidence: A Guide to Rules 301-302
Presumptions, those inferences drawn from established facts, play a crucial role in both civil and criminal cases in Michigan.
However, their application is carefully regulated by the Michigan Rules of Evidence, specifically Rules 301 and 302.
This article delves into these rules, providing a clear understanding of their purpose, scope, and practical implications for legal professionals and anyone interested in the intricacies of Michigan’s evidentiary landscape.
Rule 301: Presumptions in Civil Cases
This rule governs the burden of proof related to presumptions in civil proceedings.
It states that unless a statute or other rule dictates otherwise, the party against whom a presumption is directed has the burden of producing evidence to rebut it.
This burden of production, however, is distinct from the burden of persuasion, which remains on the party who originally had it.
In essence, a presumption shifts the responsibility to present evidence to the opposing party, but the ultimate responsibility to convince the court of their claim rests with the party bearing the initial burden.
The Michigan Rules of Evidence Handbook further clarifies the application of Rule 301.
It emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between rebuttable and conclusive presumptions.
Rebuttable presumptions, as described above, can be overcome by evidence, while conclusive presumptions are mandatory inferences that must be accepted by the jury.
The handbook also provides examples of common presumptions, such as the presumption of sanity, the presumption of legitimacy of a child born in wedlock, and the presumption of ownership arising from possession of property.
Have your rights been violated?
Have your driving priviledges been revoked?
Has your professional license been suspended?
Have you been charged with a crime?
Call our office to see if we can help
Komorn Law 248-357-2550
Rule 302: Presumptions in Criminal Cases
For criminal proceedings, Rule 302 takes a different approach. It governs presumptions against a defendant, whether recognized at common law or created by statute.
Unlike Rule 301, Rule 302 doesn’t impose a burden of production on the defendant to rebut a presumption.
Instead, it emphasizes that the prosecution retains the ultimate burden of proving all elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Unless it’s political of course.
The handbook elaborates on this key distinction.
It explains that the jury must be instructed that they may, but are not required to, infer the existence of the presumed fact from the basic facts presented.
This ensures that the jury retains its ultimate power to decide guilt or innocence based on the totality of the evidence, without being coerced by a presumption (in a perfect world).
Key Takeaways:
Civil cases: Presumptions in civil cases shift the burden of production, not the burden of persuasion, to the party against whom the presumption is directed.
Criminal cases: Presumptions against defendants in criminal cases do not shift the burden of proof. The jury must be instructed that they may infer the presumed fact, but are not obligated to do so.
Further Considerations:
The Michigan Rules of Evidence Handbook offers valuable insights into the nuances of these rules, including the specific wording of jury instructions, the interplay of presumptions with other evidentiary rules, and the potential limitations of certain presumptions.
For legal professionals navigating complex cases involving presumptions, studying the handbook and consulting relevant case law is crucial for ensuring a comprehensive understanding and effective application of these rules.
By understanding the intricacies of Rules 301 and 302, legal professionals and anyone interested in Michigan’s evidentiary rules can navigate presumptions with confidence, ensuring fair and just outcomes in both civil and criminal proceedings.
Important:
This article provides a simplified overview of the Michigan Rules of Evidence for informational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as legal advice. When facing legal matters, always consult with a qualified attorney for professional guidance.
The Michigan Rules of Evidence are subject to change over time. Always consult the latest official version for accurate information.
Here is the link to the Michigan Rules of Evidence Handbook. Check the footer for the latest update.
Related Articles
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
More Posts
Attorney Michael Komorn Lectures Students at the U of M Law School
I wanted to give a huge thanks to University of Michigan Law School Professors Howard Bromberg, Mark Osbeck and Law School class. This past Thursday I had the honor of being asked to speak about my favorite topics, the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act and the practice...
Jury Selection In Marihuana Cases
A jury trial is fundamental to our democratic system of government. Every American citizen should embrace this responsibility by participating, and ensure justice prevails. by Michael Komorn I just picked a jury in a marihuana case, there were several perspective...
Planet Green Trees Radio Episode 149-MSC People v. Koon
The best resource for everything related to Michigan medical marijuana with your host Attorney Michael Komorn. Live every Thursday evening from 8 -10 pm eastern time. By Michael Komorn The Michigan Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion making a finding that...
Polygraphs Proven Unreliable, Used for Police Intimidation
Polygraphs are widely recognized as unreliable yet police still use them to elicit confessions. By Michael Komorn Many states don’t allow polygraph test to be admitted in court because they are unreliable. Their lack of reliability is widely recognized by criminal...
Arrests for DUI’s on the Rise
By Michael Komorn Arrests for DUI’s have been on the rise across Michigan. This trend could drastically increase as The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has called on state authorities to reduce the legal limit to 0.05 percent. Currently, all 50 U.S. states...
US District Court Judge rules police cannot enter a car without a warrant to facilitate a drug dog sniff
Federal Judge Applies GPS Ruling To Drug Dog Traffic Stop By Michael Komorn Last week, a judge with the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia applied the precedent to the common police practice of “permeation” where a police officer enters a...
Drug Checkpoints: Unconstitutional
By Michael Komorn The Supreme Court ruled in City of Indianapolis V. Edmund that drug check points are unconstitutional. So what happens when you see one on the highway? Keep calm and carry on. Police, especially in the Mid-west, have been using drug check points as a...
Knowing When to Exercise Your Rights
Remember, even if you are doing nothing wrong, there are a number of different outcomes that can occur from a police encounter. The short list includes: 1) No action, no problems; 2) A warning or citation; 3) An arrest and/or criminal charges. Exercising your rights...
Why Police Lie Under Oath
Thousands of people plead guilty to crimes every year in the United States because they know that the odds of a jury’s believing their word over a police officer’s are slim to none. As a juror, whom are you likely to believe: the alleged criminal in an orange jumpsuit...
What Did I Just Get Charged With?
Below is a list of common drug offenses as defined by the State of Michigan. If it is your second offense, it is important you read statute 333.7413 below. 333.7413 Conviction of second or subsequent violation; penalty....
