Evidence in Michigan Courts: Michigan’s Evidence Rules 1001-1008

Blog, Michigan Rules of Evidence

KOMORN LAW

STATE and FEDERAL
Aggressive Legal Defense
All Criminal Allegations / DUI / Drugs
Since 1993

Michigan’s Rules of Evidence, established by the Supreme Court, dictate how evidence is presented and admitted in court proceedings. Rules 1001 through 1008, focusing on how written words, recordings, and photographs are treated as evidence.

Rule 1001: Defining the Terms

Before diving into details, Rule 1001 lays the groundwork by defining key terms:

    • Writing: Any combination of letters, words, numbers, or their equivalent, regardless of format (handwritten, digital, etc.).
    • Recording: Similar to writing, but encompassing sounds captured in any form (audio tapes, digital recordings, etc.).
    • Photograph: An image or its equivalent stored in any format (printed photographs, digital files, etc.).
  • Original: The primary version of a writing, recording, or photograph, or an authorized duplicate intended to have the same effect. For electronic information, a printout or other readable output that accurately reflects the data constitutes an original.

Rule 1002: The Quest for the Original

Generally, Rule 1002 emphasizes using the original document, recording, or photograph as evidence. This ensures authenticity and accuracy. However, exceptions exist:

    • Duplicates: If the original is unavailable or difficult to produce, a duplicate (exact copy) certified by the custodian of the original is admissible.
    • Voluminous Materials: For extensive records like business ledgers, summaries or compilations prepared by a qualified witness using the original are acceptable.
    • Lost or Destroyed Originals: Proof of loss or destruction, coupled with secondary evidence like copies or witness testimony, might allow entry of non-originals.

Rule 1003: Duplicates Step Up in Absence of Originals

When the original is unavailable and exceptions in Rule 1002 don’t apply, certified duplicates take center stage under Rule 1003. However, the opposing party has the right to challenge the authenticity of the duplicate.

Have your rights been violated?
Have your driving priviledges been revoked?
Has your professional license been suspended?
Second Amendment rights taken away?
Have you been charged with a crime?

Call our office to see if we can help
Komorn Law  248-357-2550

Rule 1004: When Copies Don’t Cut It

If neither the original nor a certified duplicate are available, Rule 1004 allows “other evidence of contents.” This could include oral testimony about the contents, copies not certified by the custodian, or even handwritten notes summarizing the original. However, such evidence faces a higher bar for admissibility due to concerns about accuracy and trustworthiness.

Rule 1005: Public Documents Take a Shortcut

For publicly available documents like government records, certified copies readily obtainable from the custodian bypass the original requirement under Rule 1005.

Rule 1006: Summaries of voluminous records get a green light

Rule 1006 reiterates the allowance for summaries of voluminous records if the original would be cumbersome to present. Here, the summary must be prepared by a qualified witness accurately reflecting the original’s substance.

Rule 1007: Parties Can Speak for Their Words

Rule 1007 empowers parties in a case to testify about the contents of their own writings, recordings, or photographs. This helps clarify ambiguities or resolve questions about intent.

Rule 1008: Judge and Jury Take Their Roles

Finally, Rule 1008 clarifies how judges and juries handle certain issues:

    • The judge decides whether certain conditions are met for admitting evidence of contents under these rules.
    • The jury decides if the writing ever existed, if a presented document is the original, or if secondary evidence accurately reflects the content.

These eight rules form the foundation for handling written, recorded, and photographic evidence in Michigan courts. Remember, this is just a summary; actual legal proceedings should involve consulting legal professionals for accurate interpretation and application of these rules.

Komorn Law Established 1993

Important:

This article provides a simplified overview of the Michigan Rules of Evidence for informational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as legal advice. When facing legal matters, always consult with a qualified attorney for professional guidance.

The Michigan Rules of Evidence are subject to change over time. Always consult the latest official version for accurate information.

Here is the link to the Michigan Rules of Evidence Handbook. Check the footer for the latest update.

Here is the link to proposed changes Michigan Court Website

 

Related Articles (see more posts after)

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

More Posts

Jury Selection In Marihuana Cases

Jury Selection In Marihuana Cases

A jury trial is fundamental to our democratic system of government. Every American citizen should embrace this responsibility by participating, and ensure justice prevails. by Michael Komorn I just picked a jury in a marihuana case, there were several perspective...

read more
Planet Green Trees Radio Episode 149-MSC People v. Koon

Planet Green Trees Radio Episode 149-MSC People v. Koon

The best resource for everything related to Michigan medical marijuana with your host Attorney Michael Komorn. Live every Thursday evening from 8 -10 pm eastern time. By Michael Komorn The Michigan Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion making a finding that...

read more
Polygraphs Proven Unreliable, Used for Police Intimidation

Polygraphs Proven Unreliable, Used for Police Intimidation

Polygraphs are widely recognized as unreliable yet police still use them to elicit confessions. By Michael Komorn Many states don’t allow polygraph test to be admitted in court because they are unreliable. Their lack of reliability is widely recognized by criminal...

read more
Arrests for DUI’s on the Rise

Arrests for DUI’s on the Rise

By Michael Komorn Arrests for DUI’s have been on the rise across Michigan. This trend could drastically increase as The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has called on state authorities to reduce the legal limit to 0.05 percent. Currently, all 50 U.S. states...

read more
Drug Checkpoints: Unconstitutional

Drug Checkpoints: Unconstitutional

By Michael Komorn The Supreme Court ruled in City of Indianapolis V. Edmund that drug check points are unconstitutional. So what happens when you see one on the highway? Keep calm and carry on. Police, especially in the Mid-west, have been using drug check points as a...

read more
Knowing When to Exercise Your Rights

Knowing When to Exercise Your Rights

Remember, even if you are doing nothing wrong, there are a number of different outcomes that can occur from a police encounter. The short list includes: 1) No action, no problems; 2) A warning or citation; 3) An arrest and/or criminal charges. Exercising your rights...

read more
Why Police Lie Under Oath

Why Police Lie Under Oath

Thousands of people plead guilty to crimes every year in the United States because they know that the odds of a jury’s believing their word over a police officer’s are slim to none. As a juror, whom are you likely to believe: the alleged criminal in an orange jumpsuit...

read more
What Did I Just Get Charged With?

What Did I Just Get Charged With?

Below is a list of common drug offenses as defined by the State of Michigan. If it is your second offense, it is important you read statute 333.7413 below. 333.7413 Conviction of second or subsequent violation; penalty....

read more

More Posts

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Michael Komorn-Criminal Defense Attorney

About Your Attorney

Attorney Michael Komorn

Categories

Law Firm VIctories

Your Rights

Share This