Michigan’s Rules of Evidence, established by the Supreme Court, dictate how evidence is presented and admitted in court proceedings. Rules 1001 through 1008, focusing on how written words, recordings, and photographs are treated as evidence.
Rule 1001: Defining the Terms
Before diving into details, Rule 1001 lays the groundwork by defining key terms:
- Writing: Any combination of letters, words, numbers, or their equivalent, regardless of format (handwritten, digital, etc.).
- Recording: Similar to writing, but encompassing sounds captured in any form (audio tapes, digital recordings, etc.).
- Photograph: An image or its equivalent stored in any format (printed photographs, digital files, etc.).
- Original: The primary version of a writing, recording, or photograph, or an authorized duplicate intended to have the same effect. For electronic information, a printout or other readable output that accurately reflects the data constitutes an original.
Rule 1002: The Quest for the Original
Generally, Rule 1002 emphasizes using the original document, recording, or photograph as evidence. This ensures authenticity and accuracy. However, exceptions exist:
- Duplicates: If the original is unavailable or difficult to produce, a duplicate (exact copy) certified by the custodian of the original is admissible.
- Voluminous Materials: For extensive records like business ledgers, summaries or compilations prepared by a qualified witness using the original are acceptable.
- Lost or Destroyed Originals: Proof of loss or destruction, coupled with secondary evidence like copies or witness testimony, might allow entry of non-originals.
Rule 1003: Duplicates Step Up in Absence of Originals
When the original is unavailable and exceptions in Rule 1002 don’t apply, certified duplicates take center stage under Rule 1003. However, the opposing party has the right to challenge the authenticity of the duplicate.
Have your rights been violated?
Have your driving priviledges been revoked?
Has your professional license been suspended?
Second Amendment rights taken away?
Have you been charged with a crime?
Call our office to see if we can help
Komorn Law 248-357-2550
Rule 1004: When Copies Don’t Cut It
If neither the original nor a certified duplicate are available, Rule 1004 allows “other evidence of contents.” This could include oral testimony about the contents, copies not certified by the custodian, or even handwritten notes summarizing the original. However, such evidence faces a higher bar for admissibility due to concerns about accuracy and trustworthiness.
Rule 1005: Public Documents Take a Shortcut
For publicly available documents like government records, certified copies readily obtainable from the custodian bypass the original requirement under Rule 1005.
Rule 1006: Summaries of voluminous records get a green light
Rule 1006 reiterates the allowance for summaries of voluminous records if the original would be cumbersome to present. Here, the summary must be prepared by a qualified witness accurately reflecting the original’s substance.
Rule 1007: Parties Can Speak for Their Words
Rule 1007 empowers parties in a case to testify about the contents of their own writings, recordings, or photographs. This helps clarify ambiguities or resolve questions about intent.
Rule 1008: Judge and Jury Take Their Roles
Finally, Rule 1008 clarifies how judges and juries handle certain issues:
- The judge decides whether certain conditions are met for admitting evidence of contents under these rules.
- The jury decides if the writing ever existed, if a presented document is the original, or if secondary evidence accurately reflects the content.
These eight rules form the foundation for handling written, recorded, and photographic evidence in Michigan courts. Remember, this is just a summary; actual legal proceedings should involve consulting legal professionals for accurate interpretation and application of these rules.
Important:
This article provides a simplified overview of the Michigan Rules of Evidence for informational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as legal advice. When facing legal matters, always consult with a qualified attorney for professional guidance.
The Michigan Rules of Evidence are subject to change over time. Always consult the latest official version for accurate information.
Here is the link to the Michigan Rules of Evidence Handbook. Check the footer for the latest update.
Here is the link to proposed changes Michigan Court Website
Related Articles (see more posts after)
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
More Posts
US court upholds ban on selling guns to marijuana card holders
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal ban on the sale of guns to medical marijuana card holders does not violate the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court said Wednesday. The ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals applies to the nine Western states that fall under...
AVVO Ratings and Reviews Update Aug 2016
Michael Komorn’s reviews 5.0 stars - 23 Total Avvo Rating: 10.0 out of 10 Cases dismissed 5.0 stars Posted by Ryan August 24, 2016 I had two charges in Wayne county. I was facing 6 years in prison. Michael was very informative and reassuring...
US Dept of Justice letter regarding prosecution for marijuana
Attorney General Eric Holder's speech regarding dropping mandatory minimums for many drug crimes is already making an impact. Read the letter from the DOJ
Clio marihuana dispensary fighting Genesee County Prosecutor’s office in court
CLIO (WJRT) - (04/25/16) - A Mid-Michigan marihuana dispensary is fighting the Genesee County Prosecutor's office in court after FANG shut them down. The owner of the Clio dispensary says warrants weren't valid and he wants his business back open. Attorneys...
New Roadside Drug Test
What is the law? The Michigan legislature has passed into law a one-year pilot program set up in five counties that allows for Michigan State Police to perform roadside drug tests. The way this will work is if a driver gets pulled over for a traffic offense, in...
Why Are Michigan Prosecutors Reassessing Their Cases Against Medical Marijuana Patients?
Trying to understand why prosecutors in St. Clair County, Michigan, suddenly decided to drop their case against Ginnifer Hency, a medical marijuana patient and caregiver, and return the property that police seized from her home, I obtained several court documents from...
Attorney: Crime labs ‘falsified’ marijuana reports
A Southfield lawyer alleges the Michigan State Police crime labs have “falsified lab reports on marijuana statewide” and he’s asking a judge to dismisses charges lodged against a client. Michael Komorn, who also represents defendants in Livingston County, said...
Clio marihuana dispensary fighting Genesee County Prosecutor’s office in court
CLIO (WJRT) - (04/25/16) - A Mid-Michigan marihuana dispensary is fighting the Genesee County Prosecutor's office in court after FANG shut them down. The owner of the Clio dispensary says warrants weren't valid and he wants his business back open. Attorneys...
Medical marijuana patients reunited with son after lengthy court battles, unfounded drug charges
SPRING LAKE, Mich. -- After 18 months, a Spring Lake family's son is out of foster care and reunited with his parents. Yet the fight to be together, through court battles and serious drug charges despite being card-carrying medical marijuana patients, still haunts...
Komorn Law Secures Release Of Lorincz Child From CPS in Marijuana Custody Case
“This is one of those cases in an attorney’s career that is not easily forgotten, and is a reminder to me of the reason I became an attorney.” – Michael Komorn, attorney from Komorn Law and recipient of the Michigan Bar Association Right to Counsel Award for 2015....