Making terrorist threat or false report of terrorism is free speech?
The US Constitution and Michigan Constitution prohibit the government from making laws that abridge the freedom of speech
Summary
In the case of People of the State of Michigan v. Michael Joseph Kvasnicka, the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed the constitutionality of the state’s law on making a threat of terrorism, MCL 750.543m.
The defendant, Michael Kvasnicka, was charged under this statute after sending a social media message to a young girl, stating she was “not gonna be laughing once I come to your school and shoot it up or blow it up.”
Don’t worry about it
Kvasnicka moved to dismiss the charges, arguing that the statute violated his First Amendment rights. The trial court denied this motion, leading to an interlocutory appeal.
Upon review, the Court of Appeals unanimously found that MCL 750.543m was unconstitutional, determining that it infringed upon free speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Read this out loud to yourself
Upon review, the Court of Appeals unanimously found that MCL 750.543m was unconstitutional, determining that it infringed upon free speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment.
750.543m Making terrorist threat or false report of terrorism; intent or capability as defense prohibited; violation as felony; penalty.
Sec. 543m.
(1) A person is guilty of making a terrorist threat or of making a false report of terrorism if the person does either of the following:
(a) Threatens to commit an act of terrorism and communicates the threat to any other person.
(b) Knowingly makes a false report of an act of terrorism and communicates the false report to any other person, knowing the report is false.
(2) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the defendant did not have the intent or capability of committing the act of terrorism.
(3) A person who violates this section is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both.
Read the Court decision here (PDF)
Your First Amendment Rights Threatened?
Fight for your Constitutional Right.
Call Our Office
Komorn Law (248) 357-2550
And now for something completely different.
Other Posts
Sometimes our posts provide a general overview of things with opinionated sarcasm and dry humor by the writer to lighten the same old same old of other law sites. It does not substitute for legal advice. Anyone charged with a criminal offense should consult an attorney for specific legal guidance. BTW. True Fact: When Michael Komorn fights the justice system there is only one focus. You and your rights.
Recent
Criminal Law FAQs – Marijuana Offenses
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Marijuana OffensesFAQ 1: Is recreational marijuana legal in Michigan? Answer: Yes, recreational marijuana is legal for adults 21 and over in Michigan. However, there are restrictions on possession, use in public places, and driving under...
Criminal Law FAQs – Operating While Intoxicated (DUI – OWI)
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Drunk Driving (Operating While Intoxicated - OWI)FAQ 1: What is the legal blood alcohol content (BAC) limit in Michigan? Answer: In Michigan, the legal BAC limit for operating a vehicle is 0.08% for individuals 21 years of age or older. For...
More
Judge blocks media access to Michigan marijuana hearings
Michigan’s largest-ever marijuana recall is at the center of a court matter that the public is forbidden from attending. The case focuses on Cannabis Regulatory Agency accusations that Viridis Laboratories, one of the largest marijuana safety testing labs in the...
Michigan marijuana testing lab says potency results are legit
Controversial Michigan marijuana testing lab says potency results are legit. IT HAS PROOF! Michigan regulators and the state’s largest marijuana safety testing lab are at odds. When customers purchase marijuana off shelves, the Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) has...
Super potent weed spurs distrust in Michigan marijuana industry
In case you missed it... The validity of results issued by marijuana safety labs in Michigan and across the nation have been called into question. There are allegations of labs intentionally issuing higher THC potency test results -- which makes the marijuana more...
Judge limits Michigan marijuana recall to half the product initially covered
A marijuana recall will proceed in part after a judge denied a testing company's request for a preliminary injunction for a recall of products tested by one of its labs, but allowed it for the other. The split decision from Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher...
Michigan lab fights back in court after marijuana recall
A marijuana lab licensed in Michigan is suing the Marijuana Regulatory Agency (MRA) over a recall that impacted nearly $230 million worth and 64,000 pounds of marijuana products in the state. Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher M. Murray on Monday appeared to...
Official Notification of Marijuana Product Recall
The Marijuana Regulatory Agency (MRA) has identified inaccurate and/or unreliable results of products tested by laboratories Viridis North, LLC and Viridis Laboratories, LLC. A link to the locations affected by the recall is at the end of this information In the...
