400K settlement after being arrested for a DUI, even though he passed breath and blood tests

400K settlement after being arrested for a DUI, even though he passed breath and blood tests

A Colorado man is poised to receive a $400,000 settlement from city authorities after being wrongfully arrested for a DUI, even though he had passed both a breath and blood test.

According to the complaint, Elias was driving southbound on College Avenue in Fort Collins around 10:30 p.m. on Jan. 4, 2020. He was heading home after leaving his girlfriend’s house following a dinner party. Upon passing the intersection of Swallow Road and College Avenue, he slowed down to ensure he hadn’t missed his intended turn to the east.

After realizing he had not missed his turn, he accelerated again but observed a car following closely in an aggressive manner.

According to the complaint, Elias then signaled a lane change to the left lane, aiming to clear the driver’s path. It is mentioned that he executed the lane change normally, lawfully, and without encountering any issues.

Gates, who was driving the car, was working that night as a member of the then-recently formed Reduce All Impaired Driving inter-police agency task force looking for drunk or impaired drivers.

The complaint claims that Gates had been roving the streets of Larimer County that night “with the sole task of looking for and charging citizens with DUIs.”

“Gates does so because this is one of the most difficult allegations to disprove, given that Loveland PD does not employ dash cams (only bodycams) and so never capture the arrested individual’s actual driving,” the complaint reads.

Gates allegedly then began to question Elias on whether he had been drinking that night.

According to the complaint Elias was taken aback by this but remained steadfast that he had not committed a violation.

Gates then allegedly said he could smell an “overwhelming odor of alcohol” coming from the vehicle — the complaint disputes this claim.

Following continued questions, Elias invoked his right to remain silent and said he was not going to answer Gates’ questions.

The complaint claims that Gates did not have probable cause to continue to detain Elias at this point.

“But Officer Gates worked at the Loveland Police Department,” the complaint reads. “And LPD had a custom for the treatment of any person who refused to submit to their authority and questioning: They would be arrested.”

Elias declined to participate in a roadside test and made it clear that he would not provide any answers to Gates’ inquiries, as stated in the complaint.

He was subsequently taken to the nearby police station on suspicion of driving under the influence, according to the information provided. It is important to note that no drugs or alcohol were discovered in Elias’ vehicle, as stated in the lawsuit.

Elias’s breath test at the station yielded a 0% blood alcohol content reading, as stated in the lawsuit.

“I’m not going to play this game,” Gates told Elias, per bodycam footage posted by Elias’ attorney.

“I’m not playing a game, this is my freedom you’re talking about,” Elias responded.

Police then instructed Elias to undergo a blood test, which, according to the lawsuit, yielded negative results for all substances tested in March 2020.

Elias underwent an investigation of his pilot’s license by the Federal Aviation Administration due to the DUI arrest, as stated in the complaint.

Allegations have been made regarding Loveland Police Department officers engaging in a competitive environment amongst themselves and with other police departments, focusing on the number of DUI arrests made.

Elias’ attorney Sarah Schielke cited social media posts from a Facebook page, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, which promoted a timed competition for the most DUI arrests between departments.

Schielke has shared screenshots of an independent assessment conducted by Jensen Hughes, a private consultancy firm, in 2021.

According to the assessment, it was stated that officers from the Loveland Police Department prioritize DUI arrests over attending to other calls.

Elias’ attorney Sarah Schielke released a YouTube video.

Have you been arrested or charged with DUI?

Charged with a Crime?
Lost Your License?
Conspiracy or CCE?
Thought Crimes?

Call Our Office for a Free Case Evaluation

Notably, Elias claims to have experienced another unjust DUI arrest in Fort Collins, a neighboring municipality to Loveland.

A separate lawsuit he filed against Fort Collins officers in May stated that he was arrested on December 2, 2021 and subsequently spent three days in jail, once again on suspicion of a DUI offense.

He had also successfully undergone a breath test and blood test, with both yielding negative results.

Elias had a child abuse report filed against him by an officer because his 15-year-old son was in his car, and he was prohibited by a judge from driving anyone under 18 for that time period, according to the lawsuit.

When Elias’ test results returned negative weeks later, the lawsuit stated that the case was dismissed.

It also alleges that the Fort Collins Police Department fosters a culture of vying for DUI arrests.

It’s remarkable that it happened to me twice,” Elias shared with CBS News. “I find it surprising that more individuals didn’t experience it twice. Their sole concern seemed to be adding another tally to their list, and I just happened to pass by on two occasions.

Read More Here: The Reporter Herald 

Here are some YouTube videos regarding the case

He’s Not Alone !!

Then there is the other side of it all

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.

THC Detection in Blood: Challenges and Implications

THC Detection in Blood: Challenges and Implications

THC Detection in Blood: Challenges and Implications When it comes to enforcing drugged driving laws, police and employers face a unique challenge with marijuana. Unlike alcohol, which is metabolized and eliminated relatively quickly, THC, the psychoactive compound in...

THC Detection in Blood: A Comprehensive Review

THC Detection in Blood: A Comprehensive Review

THC Detection in Blood: A Comprehensive Review Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive compound in marijuana, can remain detectable in the blood for several days or even weeks after use. This is due to the fact that THC is highly fat-soluble, meaning that it...

Ignition Interlock Devices – What you should know

Ignition Interlock Devices – What you should know

Ignition interlock devices (IIDs) are becoming increasingly common in the state of Michigan. An IID is a device that is installed in a vehicle and prevents the engine from starting unless the driver blows a breathalyzer test and their blood alcohol content (BAC) is...

Evaluation of Field Sobriety Tests for Identifying Drivers Under the Influence of Cannabis

Evaluation of Field Sobriety Tests for Identifying Drivers Under the Influence of Cannabis

This randomized clinical trial investigates the accuracy of field sobriety tests administered by law enforcement officers to assess functional impairment and driving performance among individuals who have smoked cannabis.

Question

How accurate are field sobriety tests (FSTs) in identifying acute Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impairment?

Findings

In this randomized clinical trial of 184 cannabis users randomized to THC or placebo, law enforcement officers classified 81.0% and 49.2%, respectively, as FST impaired, and officers suspected that 99.2% of FST-impaired participants received THC. Driving simulator performance was associated with select FSTs.

Meaning

In this study, FSTs differentiated between THC- and placebo-exposed participants; however, the substantial overlap of FST impairment between groups and the high frequency at which FST impairment was suspected to be due to THC suggest that absent other indicators, FSTs alone may be insufficient to identify THC-specific driving impairment.

If you are interested in learning more detail about this evaluation go here to the National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Meanwhile… until they figure it out, if you get a DUI for being under the influence of cannabis, although legal, you will need an experienced attorney to fight for you in the court system. If you want to fight call our office. If you don’t, well then settle for what they dish out and accept that you can’t go back and change the outcome. 

Have you been arrested or charged with DUI?

Charged with a Crime?
Lost Your License?
Conspiracy or CCE?
Thought Crimes?

Call Our Office for a Free Case Evaluation

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.

THC Detection in Blood: A Comprehensive Review

THC Detection in Blood: A Comprehensive Review

THC Detection in Blood: A Comprehensive Review Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive compound in marijuana, can remain detectable in the blood for several days or even weeks after use. This is due to the fact that THC is highly fat-soluble, meaning that it...

Cannabinoid Markers in Biological Fluids and Tissues

Cannabinoid Markers in Biological Fluids and Tissues

Summary of this paper Our Machine-Learning algorithms scan the text for the most important phrases or passages. These highlights, alongside their respective section titles, are shown below. Section 1 A sensitive and specific breathalyzer for...

Estimating the Time of Last Cannabis Use from Plasma

Estimating the Time of Last Cannabis Use from Plasma

Estimating the Time of Last Cannabis Use from Plasma  9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and 11-nor-9-Carboxy- 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Concentrations Summary of this paper Our Machine-Learning algorithms scan the text for the most important phrases or passages. These...

Excretion of Delta 9 tetrahydrocannabinol in sweat

Excretion of Delta 9 tetrahydrocannabinol in sweat

Academia - Summary of this paper Excretion of Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in sweat. Our Machine-Learning algorithms scan the text for the most important phrases or passages. These highlights, alongside their respective section titles, are shown below. Introduction...

THC Detection in Blood: Challenges and Implications

THC Detection in Blood: Challenges and Implications

THC Detection in Blood: Challenges and Implications

When it comes to enforcing drugged driving laws, police and employers face a unique challenge with marijuana. Unlike alcohol, which is metabolized and eliminated relatively quickly, THC, the psychoactive compound in marijuana, can remain detectable in the blood for several days or even weeks after use.

This is because THC is highly fat-soluble, meaning that it dissolves easily in fat cells. Once THC is absorbed into the bloodstream, it is distributed throughout the body, including the fat cells. When THC reaches the brain, it binds to cannabinoid receptors, producing the intoxicating effects associated with marijuana use.

As the intoxicating effects of THC wear off, it is released from the brain and redistributed to other tissues, including the fat cells. THC can be stored in fat cells for weeks or even months, and it is released slowly back into the bloodstream over time.

This means that a blood test for THC can detect past marijuana use, even if the individual is no longer under the influence. This poses a challenge for law enforcement and employers, who may want to use blood tests to identify drivers or employees who are currently impaired by marijuana.

Scientific Evidence

A number of studies have investigated the relationship between THC blood levels and impairment. One study found that THC blood levels above 5 ng/mL were associated with an increased risk of impaired driving performance. However, another study found that some individuals with THC blood levels below 5 ng/mL were still impaired, while others with THC blood levels above 5 ng/mL were not impaired.

These findings suggest that THC blood levels are not a reliable indicator of impairment. Other factors, such as individual metabolism, tolerance, and route of administration, can also play a role.

 

Implications

The limitations of THC blood tests for detecting impairment have important implications for law enforcement and employers. Law enforcement officers should not rely solely on blood tests to determine whether a driver is impaired by marijuana. They should also consider other factors, such as the driver’s behavior and performance on field sobriety tests.

Employers who use blood tests to screen employees for marijuana use should be aware that a positive test result does not necessarily mean that the employee is impaired at work. Employers should have a clear policy in place for responding to positive drug tests, and they should take into account all relevant factors, such as the employee’s job duties and performance.

Conclusion

THC detection in blood is a complex issue with important implications for law enforcement and employers. It is important to understand the limitations of THC blood tests and to use them in conjunction with other information to assess impairment.

Implications

The limitations of THC blood tests for detecting impairment have important implications for law enforcement and employers. Law enforcement officers should not rely solely on blood tests to determine whether a driver is impaired by marijuana. They should also consider other factors, such as the driver’s behavior and performance on field sobriety tests.

Employers who use blood tests to screen employees for marijuana use should be aware that a positive test result does not necessarily mean that the employee is impaired at work. Employers should have a clear policy in place for responding to positive drug tests, and they should take into account all relevant factors, such as the employee’s job duties and performance.

Conclusion

THC detection in blood is a complex issue with important implications for law enforcement and employers. It is important to understand the limitations of THC blood tests and to use them in conjunction with other information to assess impairment.

Conclusion

THC detection in blood is a complex issue with important implications for law enforcement and employers. It is important to understand the limitations of THC blood tests and to use them in conjunction with other information to assess impairment.

Did You Know

Michigan State Police Legal Updates

MSP Legal Update No. 153 (01/2023)

  • Search & Seizure: The smell of marihuana, standing alone, no longer constitutes probable cause to search for that substance
  • Vehicle Code: Violation for impeding traffic requires evidence the accused’s conduct actually affected the normal flow of traffic.

Legal Update No. 153 (01/2023)

 

MSP Legal Update No. 150 (01/2022)

  • Vehicle Code: Persons under the age of 21 may be prosecuted for operating a motor vehicle with the presence of marihuana in their system
  • Criminal Law: Ethnic intimidation based on gender includes harassing or intimidating another person because of the actual or perceived gender of that person.

Legal Update No. 150 (01/2022)

 

Legal Update No. 148 (09/2021)

Statutes: Code of Criminal Procedure amended to prohibit issuance of appearance tickets to a person arrested for an “operating while intoxicated” offense; Juvenile Law: Individuals who are 17 years of age to be treated as juveniles in criminal proceedings rather than automatically being treated as adults; Did You Know: The mere presence of an unidentified cocaine metabolite is insufficient to prove operation of a vehicle with the presence of “any amount” of cocaine in the body.

Legal Update No. 148 (09/2021)

 

Legal Update No. 147 (03/2021)

Statutes: The Code of Criminal Procedure amended to require persons arrested for certain misdemeanor and ordinance violations not exceeding 1-year in jail to be released from custody upon issuance and service of an appearance ticket; Vehicle Code: The Michigan Vehicle Code amended to eliminate the requirement to provide an audible signal when overtaking another vehicle.

Legal Update No. 147 (03/2021)

More Posts

Ignition Interlock Devices – What you should know

Ignition Interlock Devices – What you should know

Ignition interlock devices (IIDs) are becoming increasingly common in the state of Michigan. An IID is a device that is installed in a vehicle and prevents the engine from starting unless the driver blows a breathalyzer test and their blood alcohol content (BAC) is...

read more
Driver License Restoration in Michigan

Driver License Restoration in Michigan

Walking to work is fun. In fact very healthy and climate friendly. But sometimes wouldn't you rather just drive? Unfortunately if your not one of the privileged and had your drivers license suspended or revoked then you have to fight to get it back. Driver License...

read more
DUI in Michigan

DUI in Michigan

DUI in MichiganDriving under the influence (DUI) is a serious offense in Michigan that can result in severe legal consequences. Michigan DUI laws and penalties are designed to prevent impaired driving and keep the roads safe for everyone. From fines and license...

read more
Michigan’s DUI Laws and Penalties

Michigan’s DUI Laws and Penalties

Michigan's OWI Laws and PenaltiesAn DUI / OUI / OWVI conviction requires proof only that the driver shows visible signs of impairment due to ingesting alcohol or drugs. The Michigan Law Under MCL 257.625(3), you are assumed guilty of a crime if, regardless of your...

read more
Michigan Law on Boating Under the Influence

Michigan Law on Boating Under the Influence

Michigan Laws on Boating Under the InfluenceBoating is a fun activity, but it can be dangerous if the operator is under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Michigan law prohibits operating a motorboat while under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Boating Under the...

read more
MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIHUANA ACT – Section 4 Defense

MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIHUANA ACT – Section 4 Defense

Marijuana Criminal Defense Client with medical marijuana card was charged with marijuana possession. Client was assigned a court appointed lawyer and encouraged to plead guilty and accept 3 months of probation. Client hired Michael Komorn for representation and...

read more
Michigan Methamphetamine Defense

Michigan Methamphetamine Defense

  Bill Schuette, the current Michigan Attorney General, is waging war against Meth users, dealers and labs. Innocent people get swept up with meth crimes when police run field tests on any powdery substances, frequently returning false positive results. Komorn...

read more
Ignition Interlock Devices – What you should know

Ignition Interlock Devices – What you should know

Ignition interlock devices (IIDs) are becoming increasingly common in the state of Michigan. An IID is a device that is installed in a vehicle and prevents the engine from starting unless the driver blows a breathalyzer test and their blood alcohol content (BAC) is below a certain limit.

When is an IID required in Michigan?

An IID is required in Michigan for the following offenses:

  • First-time DUI conviction with a BAC of 0.17% or higher
  • Second or subsequent DUI conviction
  • Driving with a minor in the vehicle while under the influence of alcohol

An IID may also be required as a condition of probation for other alcohol-related offenses.

How does an IID work?

An IID is typically installed under the steering wheel of a vehicle. When the driver wants to start the engine, they must blow into a tube attached to the device. The device will then analyze the driver’s breath for alcohol. If the driver’s BAC is below the preset limit, the engine will start. If the driver’s BAC is above the limit, the engine will not start and the driver will be unable to drive.

In addition to preventing the engine from starting, IIDs also require drivers to provide rolling retests while driving. This means that the device will randomly prompt the driver to blow into the tube at different times during the trip. If the driver fails a rolling retest, the engine will shut off and the driver will be unable to restart it.

How long do I have to use an IID?

The length of time that a driver is required to use an IID depends on the offense. For a first-time DUI conviction with a BAC of 0.17% or higher, the IID requirement is six months. For a second or subsequent DUI conviction, the IID requirement is one year. For driving with a minor in the vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, the IID requirement is three years.

How much does an IID cost?

The cost of an IID varies depending on the manufacturer and the features of the device. However, drivers can expect to pay around $100 per month to rent an IID. There is also an installation fee and a fee for monthly calibration.

How do I get an IID installed?

To get an IID installed, you must contact a certified IID installer. The installer will schedule an appointment to install the device in your vehicle. You will need to provide proof of insurance and a valid driver’s license.

Can I get an IID waiver?

In some cases, drivers may be eligible for an IID waiver. For example, a driver may be eligible for a waiver if they have a medical condition that prevents them from using an IID. To apply for an IID waiver, you must contact the Secretary of State’s Office.

Did You Know

Michigan State Police Legal Updates

MSP Legal Update No. 153 (01/2023)

  • Search & Seizure: The smell of marihuana, standing alone, no longer constitutes probable cause to search for that substance
  • Vehicle Code: Violation for impeding traffic requires evidence the accused’s conduct actually affected the normal flow of traffic.

Legal Update No. 153 (01/2023)

 

MSP Legal Update No. 150 (01/2022)

  • Vehicle Code: Persons under the age of 21 may be prosecuted for operating a motor vehicle with the presence of marihuana in their system
  • Criminal Law: Ethnic intimidation based on gender includes harassing or intimidating another person because of the actual or perceived gender of that person.

Legal Update No. 150 (01/2022)

 

MSP Legal Update No. 149 (10/2021)

  • Search & Seizure: Persons have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their property against “drone” surveillance conducted without a warrant or pursuant to a recognized exception to the warrant requirement
  • Search & Seizure: The “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement does not extend to the home.

Legal Update No. 149 (10/2021)

More Posts

Restoring Second Amendment Rights in Michigan

Restoring Second Amendment Rights in Michigan

Restoring Your Gun RightsAs of 4/17/24...There is still a second amendment The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution grants citizens the right to bear arms, a fundamental aspect of American freedoms. However, in some cases, just like every other right...

read more
Disciplining Student’s Speech Violates First Amendment

Disciplining Student’s Speech Violates First Amendment

You go girl!!!A public high school was found to have violated the First Amendment when it suspended a student from her cheerleading team for using profane speech off campus. Mahanoy Area Sch Dist v BL, No 20-255, ___ US ___ (June 23, 2021). The U.S. Supreme Court has...

read more
Cannabis cash transactions aren’t suspicious says IRS

Cannabis cash transactions aren’t suspicious says IRS

Following The MoneyLarge cash transactions by marijuana businesses should not be automatically flagged as suspicious, as per the latest IRS guidance. The tax agency's guidance aims to provide clarity on the federal Bank Secrecy Act, which mandates businesses,...

read more
An Independent Review of the Intoxilyzer 9000

An Independent Review of the Intoxilyzer 9000

An Independent Review of the Intoxilyzer 9000 Part 1 - Residual mouth alcohol detection Counterpoint Volume 2; Issue 2 - Article 3 (August 2017) An article in the Core Skills III-2 Module Jan Semenoff, BA, EMAForensic CriminalistThe opportunity to conduct an...

read more
The Intoxilyzer 9000 (part 1)

The Intoxilyzer 9000 (part 1)

The Intoxilyzer 9000 (part 1 of 2)Roll-Out The Michigan State Police (MSP) initiated Intoxilyzer 9000 (Intoxilyzer) training for police officers statewide, commencing in 2023. In order to participate, officers were required to complete both preliminary breath test...

read more
The Intoxilyzer 9000 (part 2)

The Intoxilyzer 9000 (part 2)

The Intoxilyzer 9000 (part 2 of 2)Using it The Intoxilyzer is user-friendly and equipped with a built-in feature to alert officers of any potential issues. As a precautionary measure, officers are specifically advised to switch off their portable radios prior to...

read more
DUI in Michigan

DUI in Michigan

DUI in Michigan

Driving under the influence (DUI) is a serious offense in Michigan that can result in severe legal consequences.

Michigan DUI laws and penalties are designed to prevent impaired driving and keep the roads safe for everyone. From fines and license suspension to imprisonment and mandatory installation of ignition interlock devices, the penalties for DUI in Michigan can be severe and long-lasting.

Understanding Michigan’s DUI laws, penalties, and legal procedures is essential for anyone facing DUI charges or concerned about their driving behavior.

 

What is a DUI in Michigan?

Driving under the influence, commonly known as a DUI, is a criminal offense in Michigan. In essence, a DUI is when a person operates a vehicle while under the influence of drugs or alcohol that impairs their ability to drive safely.

Understanding the legal definition of DUI in Michigan

Michigan law defines a DUI as operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, a controlled substance, or any other intoxicating substance. The legal threshold for a DUI in Michigan is a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher.

Penalties for DUI in Michigan

The penalties for a DUI in Michigan vary depending on the number of previous convictions and whether certain factors are present, such as having a high BAC or causing property damage or injury.

First-time DUI penalties

For a first-time DUI offender, penalties may include up to 93 days in jail, fines up to $500, a license suspension for up to six months, and six points added to their driving record.

Second-time DUI penalties

The penalty for a second DUI conviction within seven years includes up to a year in jail, fines up to $1,000, and a license suspension for a minimum of one year, among other penalties.

Third-time DUI penalties

A third DUI conviction within ten years is a felony offense, which carries a sentence of up to five years in prison, fines, and a license suspension for a minimum of five years.

Aggravated DUI penalties

Aggravated DUI, in cases where the driver has a BAC of 0.17% or higher, can result in harsher penalties. This includes higher fines and a longer license suspension period.

KOMORN LAW

STATE and FEDERAL
Aggressive Legal Defense
All Criminal Allegations / DUI / Drugs
Since 1993

Alcohol Concentration (BAC) limits in Michigan

Michigan has set legal limits for the BAC of drivers, which vary depending on age and commercial driver status.

Legal BAC limits for drivers over 21

For drivers over 21 years old, the legal BAC limit is 0.08%. This means that driving with a BAC of 0.08% or higher is a criminal offense.

Lower BAC limits for commercial drivers and underage drivers

Commercial drivers have a lower legal BAC limit, set at 0.04%. Underage drivers, those who are under 21, have a zero-tolerance policy in Michigan, meaning any amount of alcohol in their system while driving is considered illegal.

Michigan’s Zero Tolerance policy for underage drinking and driving

Michigan has a zero-tolerance policy for those under the age of 21, which means that any amount of alcohol in their system while driving is illegal and can result in serious legal consequences.

The legal consequences for minors caught driving under the influence

Minors caught driving under the influence face license suspension, fines, community service, and mandatory attendance in alcohol treatment programs. They may also face criminal charges, which can result in jail time and a permanent criminal record. Parents or legal guardians of underage drivers may also face charges in some circumstances.

Ignition Interlock Device requirements in Michigan

Michigan has strict laws and penalties for driving under the influence. One of the consequences of being convicted of a DUI in Michigan is the requirement of an ignition interlock device (IID) installation. An IID is a device that requires the driver to pass a breathalyzer test before starting the car.

Who is required to install an ignition interlock device?

In Michigan, ignition interlock devices are required for all individuals convicted of two or more DUIs, as well as first-time offenders with a BAC (blood alcohol concentration) of 0.17 or higher. For individuals who refuse to take a breathalyzer test, an ignition interlock device is required for one year.

Costs and installation procedures for ignition interlock devices

The cost of an ignition interlock device in Michigan varies depending on the provider and the length of time required to use it. Typically, installation costs range from $50 to $200, and monthly rental fees range from $50 to $100. The duration of the IID use also varies, depending on the individual’s case.

To install an IID, a driver must contact a state-approved vendor to make an appointment. The vendor will install and calibrate the device and provide training on its use. The driver also needs to show proof of insurance and submit contact information for a backup person who may be contacted if a violation occurs.

Michigan’s Implied Consent Law and its consequences

 

What is implied consent?

Under Michigan’s implied consent law, drivers are required to take a breathalyzer test if they are pulled over on suspicion of drunk driving. This means that by getting behind the wheel, you are giving your consent to be tested if asked by law enforcement.

Penalties for refusing a breathalyzer test in Michigan

Refusing to take a breathalyzer test in Michigan carries serious consequences, including a one-year driver’s license suspension for first-time offenders. The suspension is longer for repeat offenders, and a judge may also require an ignition interlock device installation. Additionally, a refusal to take a breathalyzer test can be used against you in court and may result in a longer jail sentence or steeper fines if convicted of DUI.

How to defend yourself against DUI charges in Michigan

 

The importance of hiring a qualified DUI attorney

If you are facing DUI charges in Michigan, hiring a qualified DUI attorney is essential. An experienced attorney can assess the evidence against you, identify any weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, and develop a strong defense strategy.

Possible defense strategies for DUI charges in Michigan

There are several defense strategies that can be used in DUI cases in Michigan. Some of these include challenging the legality of the traffic stop, questioning the accuracy of the breathalyzer test, or arguing that the field sobriety tests were not administered properly. A qualified attorney will be able to identify the best defense strategy based on the specifics of your case.In conclusion, Michigan’s DUI laws and penalties are designed to discourage impaired driving and promote road safety. If you are facing DUI charges or have concerns about your driving behavior, it is important to seek legal advice and understand your rights and obligations under Michigan’s DUI laws. By following the legal guidelines and making responsible choices, we can all help prevent drunk driving and keep Michigan’s roads safe for everyone.

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)
Act 328 of 1931
Chapter XXVA
CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES
Read the law  -or-  Check for updates

Law Firm Victories