Michigan’s DUI Laws and Penalties

Michigan’s DUI Laws and Penalties

Michigan’s OWI Laws and Penalties

An DUI / OUI / OWVI conviction requires proof only that the driver shows visible signs of impairment due to ingesting alcohol or drugs.

The Michigan Law

Under MCL 257.625(3), you are assumed guilty of a crime if, regardless of your blood alcohol content, your ability to operate a vehicle was “visibly impaired” by alcohol.

This is referred to as “operating while visibly impaired” or OWVI.

Michigan’s OWI and OWVI Laws

There are two main categories: operating while under the influence of drugs or alcohol (OWI) and operating while visibly impaired (OWVI) by drugs or alcohol. Some people still use the term DUI, but it’s the same thing as OWI.

An OWI is the more serious offense. It means you were driving while:

  • under the influence of alcohol or drugs
  • had a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .08% or greater
  • had any amount of illegal drugs in your body

Once again –> an OWVI conviction only requires proof that you only showed visible signs of impairment due to alcohol or drugs.

 

This is why you need to retain a lawyer.  Even if your going to take a plea.

 

Michigan’s OWI and OWVI Penalties

If you’re convicted of OWI or OWVI, you’ll face penalties according to Michigan law. For most convictions, you’ll lose your license, pay fines, and possibly go to jail.

How Long an OWI or OWVI Stays on Your Record in Michigan

OWIs and OWVIs stay on your record for seven years in Michigan. This means that if you get another conviction within seven years, it will count as a prior conviction and you’ll face harsher penalties.

 

Michigan DUI Penalties

1st Offense

If you are caught driving under the influence (DUI) in Michigan for the first time, you may face up to 93 days in jail (up to 180 days if your blood alcohol content (BAC) was .17% or greater). You may also be fined $100 to $500 ($200 to $700 if your BAC was .17% or greater) and ordered to complete up to 360 hours of community service.

2nd Offense

If you are caught DUI for the second time, you may face 5 days to one year in jail, a fine of $200 to $1,000, and 30 to 90 days of community service. Your vehicle may also be immobilized for 90 to 180 days (if not forfeited).

3rd Offense

If you are caught DUI for the third time, you may face one to five years in jail (30 days to one year if community service is ordered), a fine of $500 to $5,000, and 60 to 180 days of community service. Your vehicle may also be immobilized for one to three years (if not forfeited).

Jail

If you are caught DUI in Michigan, you may face jail time depending on the offense. The length of jail time increases with each subsequent offense.

 

Vehicle Immobilization for OWI and OWVI Convictions in Michigan

If you are convicted of operating while intoxicated (OWI) or operating while visibly impaired (OWVI) in Michigan, the judge may order the immobilization or forfeiture of your vehicle. For a first offense, immobilization or forfeiture is optional, but for any subsequent offense, it is mandatory. The length of immobilization increases with each subsequent offense.

  • 1st offense. Possibly forfeiture or immobilization for up to 180 days.
  • 2nd offense. Immobilization for 90 to 180 days is mandatory (if not forfeited).
  • 3rd offense. Immobilization for one to three years is mandatory (if not forfeited).

 

Michigan’s OWI Enhancements for Passengers Under 16 Years Old

If you are caught DUI with a passenger under 16 years old in Michigan, you may face additional penalties. For a first offense, you may be fined $200 to $1,000 and either serve five days to one year in jail or complete 30 to 90 days of community service. For a subsequent offense with a passenger under 16, you may be fined $500 to $5,000 and either serve one to five years in jail or probation (which must include five days to one year in jail and 30 to 90 days of community service).

KOMORN LAW

STATE and FEDERAL
Aggressive Legal Defense
All Criminal Allegations / DUI / Drugs
Since 1993

Can you get a DUI removed from your record in Michigan?

The waiting period to have a first-time operating while intoxicated offense expunged from your record is 5 years.

As of February 19th, 2022, first time operating while intoxicated convictions are now eligible to be set-aside (expunged) under certain circumstances.

 

Waiting Time

  • When seeking to expunge one or more serious misdemeanor convictions or one felony conviction, at least 5 years from the latest of the following events: date of the sentencing, completion of a term of probation, discharge from parole, or completion of any term of imprisonment.
  • When seeking to expunge more than one felony conviction, at least 7 years from the latest of the following events: date of the sentencing, completion of a term of probation, discharge from parole, or completion of any term of imprisonment.
  • When seeking to expunge one or more misdemeanor convictions (other than serious misdemeanors and any misdemeanor conviction for an assaultive crime), at least 3 years from the latest of the following events: date of the sentencing, completion of a term of probation, or completion of any term of imprisonment.

Law Firm VIctories

Your Rights

Michigan Law on Boating Under the Influence

Michigan Law on Boating Under the Influence

Michigan Laws on Boating Under the Influence

Boating is a fun activity, but it can be dangerous if the operator is under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Michigan law prohibits operating a motorboat while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Boating Under the Influence (BUI)

A person can be convicted of a BUI for operating a motorboat with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08% or greater, with any amount of a controlled substance, or while impaired by drugs and/or alcohol to an extent that the person is substantially deprived of normal control or clarity of mind.

Boating While Visibly Impaired (BWVI)

A person can be convicted of a BWVI for operating a motorboat while visibly impaired by drugs and/or alcohol. 

KOMORN LAW

STATE and FEDERAL
Aggressive Legal Defense
All Criminal Allegations / DUI / Drugs
Since 1993

Potential Penalties

The potential penalties an offender faces depend on which classification he or she is convicted of.

BUI Penalties

The consequences for a first, second, and third BUI are:

First offense: A first-offense BUI is a misdemeanor and carries up to 45 days of community service, a maximum of 93 days in jail, and fines ranging from $100 to $500. Also, the court can suspend the offender’s privilege to operate a motorboat for one to two years.

Second offense: If a BUI offender has a prior BUI or BWVI conviction that occurred within the past seven years, the second offense will be a misdemeanor and carry from $200 to $1,000 in fines. The court also must sentence the offender to either ten to 90 days community service and up to one year in jail (option one) or 48 hours to one year in jail and up to 90 days community service (option two). And the court must suspend the offender’s privilege to operate a motorboat for at least two years.

Third offense: If a BUI offender has two or more prior BUI or BWVI convictions—regardless of how long ago they occurred—the third or subsequent offense will be a felony and carry one year to five years in jail and/or $500 to $5,000 in fines. If the offender has two more priors within the past ten years, the court must suspend the offender’s privilege to operate a motorboat indefinitely. However, if the offender has two or more priors but one or none within the past ten years, the court either can suspend the boater’s operating privilege for one to two years (no priors within seven years) or must suspend the boater’s operating privilege for at least two years (one prior within seven years).

Law Firm VIctories

Your Rights

Victory – Case Dismissed – 3rd OWI – High BAC

Victory – Case Dismissed – 3rd OWI – High BAC

This one was an epic battle, that started right before the shut down in March of 2020 and involved the following:

Preliminary Exam 1.

After filing several motions to be heard at the preliminary exam, the police failed to appear and the charges were dismissed.

The charges were then re-issued.

At the arraignment on the re-issued charges and in response to my arguments  for personal bond, the court said, “ Counsel that may be true that your client has not had an alcohol related driving offense for over 12 years but what about all the times he drove drunk and wasn’t arrested? Bond is set at 5,000 cash.

Motion to Recuse

Based upon the aforementioned statements by the Court, I was forced to move to Disqualify the Court for bias.

The Court disagreed.

Appeal to Circuit Court ( Regarding the Arraignment and Setting of Bond).

We appealed the District Court Judges Ruling at the arraignment , setting of Bond and its denial of my motion to disqualify the Court for bias.

The Circuit Court ( acting as the Appellate Court) reversed the District Court’s  denial of my Motion to Disqualify,  reset the bond as a personal bond and remanded to the District Court for a Preliminary  Exam to be heard by a different Judge.

Preliminary Exam 2

We refilled our motions in the District Court and appeared for the exam.

The facts involved a vehicle reported to be stalled out, in a church parking lot, and the police were called for a welfare check (although what unfolded seemed to have little to do with the welfare of my client).

Described as standing outside of the vehicle at the time the police arrived for the welfare check, the vehicle was inoperable, not working, stalled out, the engine was not on or working and no keys were found at the scene.

Allegedly, wine bottles were found in the back of the inoperable vehicle, allegedly my client failed the standard and non standardized field sobriety test. He was subsequently arrested, and taken to the stations for Breath Testing.

Allegedly my client refused or technically refused to submit a breath sample, and the arresting officer acting as the affiant, sought out and obtained a search warrant for the blood of my client. The Blood results allegedly were above the legal limit of .08 g/ml and above the High BAC threshold of 0.17 per milliliters of Blood.

During the testimony of the arresting officer, (and not mentioned in any of the police reports) for the first time it was revealed that allegedly my client was observed about an hour prior to the “welfare check” in the driver seat behind the wheel of the vehicle (he was later observed standing near at the time of the welfare check).

This revelation by the officer also included the following: I observed your client behind the wheel of the vehicle we later saw him standing next to, at that time, the vehicle was being pushed by a younger gentleman.

Your client didn’t say anything to me, but the young man pushing the vehicle did say , the car broke down, and I am pushing it out of the road.”

Other highlights from the exam included testimony surrounding the affidavit and search warrant for the blood.

After some hemming and hawing, the court found probable cause existed to bind my client over for Trial.

The Circuit Court.

We filed additional motions in the circuit court. As it goes sometimes, despite perfecting service through the on-line filing system, providing courtesy copies to the Court, we appeared three times, and each time a different prosecutor appeared for the State.

Each time the new assistant prosecutor appeared, they knew nothing about the motions, didn’t receive them, are not connected to the on line filing system, and didn’t even know that the hearing and motions were scheduled.

The Wheels of Justice Grind Slow

Today we finally got an opportunity to argue our motions, or at least one of them. The Court it turned out was in the middle of a jury trial but was able to get us in during the lunch break for some limited arguing.

All involved ( The Judge, the assistant Prosecutor) commented that the facts made this an interesting case. Generally,  the essential elements or issues that are needed to prove a Drunk driving case/ Operating While Intoxicated case, are that the person was intoxicated at the time they were operating the motor vehicle.(1)

if a person pulls over after driving, and then consumes alcohol while in their vehicle without any intention of further driving, even while stationary in a parking lot, would be ill advised and very likely to result in an arrest for Operating While Intoxicated, despite not actually driving, because the driver would be in “actual physical control of the vehicle.”

Likewise, pulling over because a driver feels intoxicated with the intention of not driving but instead sleeping it off, would also likely result in an arrest, should police contact occur.

Other States allow for a driver who thinks they may be impaired to pull over, rest and even sleep, without being charged with “operating” while intoxicated.

In Michigan the word “operating” has been interpreted broadly is defined as driving or having actual physical control of the “vehicle.”

The cases and jurisprudence in Michigan that have interpreted these rules are generally not favorable for the accused/ driver.

The reason why this case was interesting, were mostly focused on the legal definitions of “Motor Vehicle” and Vehicle” ( See below).  (2)

The Court Decision

Today the Court heard arguments on these issues. The Court ultimately agreed with me, that in fact the testimony at the preliminary exam of the arresting officer who had “observed my client behind the wheel of the vehicle we later saw him standing next to, at that time, the vehicle was being pushed by a younger gentleman.

(Your client didn’t say anything to me, but the young man pushing the vehicle did say , the car broke down, and I am pushing it out of the road)” had described a situation that did not include evidence of “a motor vehicle” or a “vehicle” as those terms are defined within Michigan Law.

The Court found the District Court Judge had erred in making the decision to bind over my client for trial, and that probable cause did not exist or was not at the preliminary exam, to wit: The State had failed to prove that probable cause existed that my client was “operating a moving vehicle/ vehicle” while intoxicated, and dismissed all of the charges.

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (EXCERPT) Act 175 of 1927

777.1 Definitions.

Sec. 1. As used in this chapter:

(g) “Vehicle” means that term as defined in section 79 of the Michigan vehicle code, 1949 PA 300, MCL 257.79. (below)

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE (EXCERPT) Act 300 of 1949

Sec. 79.

“Vehicle” means every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway, except devices exclusively moved by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks and except, only for the purpose of titling and registration under this act, a mobile home as defined in section 2 of the mobile home commission act, Act No. 96 of the Public Acts of 1987, being section 125.2302 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.(4)

257.33 “Motor vehicle” defined.

Sec. 33.

  “Motor vehicle” means every vehicle that is self-propelled, but for purposes of chapter 4, motor vehicle does not include industrial equipment such as a forklift, a front-end loader, or other construction equipment that is not subject to registration under this act.

Motor vehicle does not include a power-driven mobility device when that power-driven mobility device is being used by an individual with a mobility disability.

Motor vehicle does not include an electric patrol vehicle being operated in compliance with the electric patrol vehicle act, 1997 PA 55, MCL 257.1571 to 257.1577.

Motor vehicle does not include an electric personal assistive mobility device. Motor vehicle does not include an electric carriage.

Motor vehicle does not include a commercial quadricycle. Motor vehicle does not include an electric bicycle. Motor vehicle does not include an electric skateboard.

FOOTNOTES

Footnote –(1)

Mi Crim Jury Instructions 15.1, 15.1a, 15.2, 15.3

Footnote –(2) 

777.1 Definitions.

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (EXCERPT) Act 175 of 1927

Sec. 1. As used in this chapter:

(a) “Aircraft” means that term as defined in section 2 of the aeronautics code of the state of Michigan, 1945 PA 327, MCL 259.2.

(b) “Departure” means that term as defined in section 31 of chapter IX.

(c) “Homicide” means any crime in which the death of a human being is an element of that crime.

(d) “Intermediate sanction” means that term as defined in section 31 of chapter IX.

(e) “ORV” means that term as defined in section 81101 of the natural resources and environmental

protection act, 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.81101.

(f) “Snowmobile” means that term as defined in section 82101 of the natural resources and environmental

protection act, 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.82101.

(g) “Vehicle” means that term as defined in section 79 of the Michigan vehicle code, 1949 PA 300, MCL

257.79.

(h) “Vessel” means that term as defined in section 80104 of the natural resources and environmental

protection act, 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.80104.

History: Add. 1998, Act 317, Eff. Dec. 15, 1998;Am. 2000, Act 279, Eff. Oct. 1, 2000;Am. 2002, Act 34, Eff. May 15, 2002.

Footnote -(3)

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE (EXCERPT)Act 300 of 1949

257.33 “Motor vehicle” defined.

Sec. 33.

  “Motor vehicle” means every vehicle that is self-propelled, but for purposes of chapter 4, motor vehicle does not include industrial equipment such as a forklift, a front-end loader, or other construction equipment that is not subject to registration under this act. Motor vehicle does not include a power-driven mobility device when that power-driven mobility device is being used by an individual with a mobility disability. Motor vehicle does not include an electric patrol vehicle being operated in compliance with the electric patrol vehicle act, 1997 PA 55, MCL 257.1571 to 257.1577. Motor vehicle does not include an electric personal assistive mobility device. Motor vehicle does not include an electric carriage. Motor vehicle does not include a commercial quadricycle. Motor vehicle does not include an electric bicycle. Motor vehicle does not include an electric skateboard.

History: 1949, Act 300, Eff. Sept. 23, 1949 ;– Am. 1993, Act 300, Eff. Jan. 1, 1994 ;– Am. 1995, Act 140, Imd. Eff. July 10, 1995 ;– Am. 1997, Act 56, Imd. Eff. July 1, 1997 ;– Am. 2002, Act 494, Imd. Eff. July 3, 2002 ;– Am. 2013, Act 36, Imd. Eff. May 21, 2013 ;– Am. 2015, Act 127, Imd. Eff. July 15, 2015 ;– Am. 2017, Act 139, Eff. Jan. 28, 2018 ;– Am. 2018, Act 204, Eff. Sept. 18, 2018 ;– Am. 2018, Act 391, Eff. Mar. 19, 2019

Footnote –(4)

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE (EXCERPT) Act 300 of 1949

Sec. 79. “Vehicle” means every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway, except devices exclusively moved by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks and except, only for the purpose of titling and registration under this act, a mobile home as defined in section 2 of the mobile home commission act, Act No. 96 of the Public Acts of 1987, being section 125.2302 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

History: 1949, Act 300, Eff. Sept. 23, 1949;Am. 1976, Act 439, Imd. Eff. Jan. 13, 1977;Am. 1978, Act 568, Eff. Jan. 6, 1979; Am. 1992, Act 134, Eff. Oct. 1, 1992.

End of Footnotes

If you or someone you know has been accused of a crime, DUI or Drugged Driving. Call Komorn Law and turn your defense into an offense.
Call Now 248-357-2550

Komorn Law Social Media

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

2nd amendment 2020 2021 BMMR CBD corruption. prosecutors dispensary Driving DUI forfeiture gun rights hemp komornlaw lara law enforcement abuse laws Legalization marijuana Medical Marijuana Michigan michigan laws michigan news MMFLA MRA news police politics Recreational Cannabis science usa news

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.

Can you drink and drive on private property in Michigan?

Can you drink and drive on private property in Michigan?

You can be arrested for DUI when on private property. Private means only so much. Michigan’s drunk driving law allows the police to arrest you for DUI or OUI even if you’re on your own property!

(1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle on a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within this state if the person is operating while intoxicated.

Michigan Legislature – Section 257.625

The Michigan Supreme Court says a driveway is no refuge for a drunken driver.

The court says Northville authorities could charge Gino Rea with drunken driving, even if his car never left the driveway. The court says a driveway is “generally accessible to motor vehicles” under state law, even if on private property.

Police went to Rea’s home three times one day in 2014 to respond to noise complaints. At one point, an officer saw him drive out of the garage and pull back in. His blood-alcohol level was three times the legal limit.

In a dissent Monday, justices Bridget McCormack and David Viviano say the court should be “hesitant to assume” that lawmakers wanted to extend their reach to the private property of homeowners.

Michigan Supreme Court Drunk Driving in Driveway

Can you consume cannabis and drive on private property in Michigan?

Marijuana and driving laws in Michigan prohibit operating a vehicle under the influence, consuming while operating a vehicle and smoking as a passenger in the passenger compartment. One would assume that drinking and consuming cannabis lead to a driving or operating under the influence issue and the answer would be.. NOPE

(e) consuming marihuana in a public place or smoking marihuana where prohibited by the person who owns, occupies, or manages the property, except for purposes of this subdivision a public place does not include an area designated for consumption within a municipality that has authorized consumption in designated areas that are not accessible to persons under 21 years of age;

(g) consuming marihuana while operating, navigating, or being in physical control of any motor vehicle, aircraft, snowmobile, off-road recreational vehicle, or motorboat, or smoking marihuana within the passenger area of a vehicle upon a public way;

http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-333-27954

Can a passenger drink in a car in Michigan?

(1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (5), a person who is an operator or occupant shall not transport or possess alcoholic liquor in a container that is open or uncapped or upon which the seal is broken within the passenger area of a vehicle upon a highway, or within the passenger area of a moving vehicle in …

Michigan Legislature – Section 257.624a

Can a passenger consume cannabis in a car in Michigan?

(g) consuming marihuana while operating, navigating, or being in physical control of any motor vehicle, aircraft, snowmobile, off-road recreational vehicle, or motorboat, or smoking marihuana within the passenger area of a vehicle upon a public way;

http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-333-27954

Legal Defense-DUI-OUI-Cannabis-Criminal in Michigan
Legal Defense-DUI-OUI-Cannabis-Criminal in Michigan

Here’s the transportation laws

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE (EXCERPT)
Act 300 of 1949

257.624a Transportation or possession of alcoholic liquor in open or uncapped container open or upon which seal broken; violation as misdemeanor; exception; subsections (1) and (2) inapplicable to passenger in commercial quadricycle; definitions.

Sec. 624a.

(1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (5), a person who is an operator or occupant shall not transport or possess alcoholic liquor in a container that is open or uncapped or upon which the seal is broken within the passenger area of a vehicle upon a highway, or within the passenger area of a moving vehicle in any place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, in this state.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (5), a person may transport or possess alcoholic liquor in a container that is open or uncapped or upon which the seal is broken within the passenger area of a vehicle upon a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles in this state, if the vehicle does not have a trunk or compartment separate from the passenger area, and the container is in a locked glove compartment, behind the last upright seat, or in an area not normally occupied by the operator or a passenger.

(3) A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor. As part of the sentence, the person may be ordered to perform community service and undergo substance abuse screening and assessment at his or her own expense as described in section 703(1) of the Michigan liquor control code of 1998, 1998 PA 58, MCL 436.1703. A court shall not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere for a violation of this section from a person charged solely with a violation of section 625(6).

(4) This section does not apply to a passenger in a chartered vehicle authorized to operate by the state transportation department.

(5) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, unless prohibited by local ordinance, subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to a passenger in a commercial quadricycle. A passenger in a commercial quadricycle shall not transport or possess alcoholic liquor other than beer, wine, spirits, or a mixed spirits drink.

(6) As used in this section:

(a) “Glove compartment” means a recess with a hinged and locking door in the dashboard of a motor vehicle.

(b) “Passenger area” means the area designed to seat the operator and passengers of a motor vehicle while it is in operation and any area that is readily accessible to the operator or a passenger while in his or her seating position, including the glove compartment.


History: Add. 1991, Act 98, Eff. Jan. 1, 1992 ;– Am. 1994, Act 211, Eff. Nov. 1, 1994 ;– Am. 1996, Act 493, Eff. Apr. 1, 1997 ;– Am. 1998, Act 349, Eff. Oct. 1, 1999 ;– Am. 2012, Act 306, Imd. Eff. Oct. 1, 2012 ;– Am. 2015, Act 126, Imd. Eff. July 15, 2015

If you or someone you know has been accused of a crime or DUI.
Call Komorn Law Call Now 248-357-2550

Komorn Law Social Media

Recent Posts

DISCLAIMER
In a legal environment that continues to evolve, it is essential to stay informed and seek guidance from knowledgeable professionals. Before acting on any information you find on the internet, this website, any linked website, any referring website or any verbal or written information consult a licensed attorney. Contact Komorn Law today to discuss your case and learn how we can assist you in navigating the complexities of Michigan’s laws. Consult an Attorney – Remember you’re on the internet.

Driving Under The Influence Penalties in Michigan

Driving Under The Influence Penalties in Michigan

Prescription drugs, medical marijuana, recreational cannabis, alcohol and more are considered to influence you in a way the law deems a crime.  Therefore you can be charged with operating a motor vehicle or driving under the influence and here are your possible penalties in the state of Michigan.

It can be a car, a boat, a moped, a motorcycle, a riding lawn mower, a hovercraft or as those of you from the future know all to well… spacecraft (even on auto pilot). Well you say – I’m on a horse and it knows it’s way home.  Well there’s a another special charge for you we won’t get into here.

  • –   a $100 to $500 fine and one or more of the following:
  • –   Up to 93 days in jail.
  • –   Up to 360 hours of community service.
  • –   Driver’s license suspension for 30 days, followed by license restrictions for 150 days.
  • –   Possible vehicle immobilization
  • –   Possible ignition interlock
  • –    Six points added to driving record
  • –    Driver Responsibility Fee ($1,000 for 2 consecutive years)
  • –   $200 to $1000 fine, and one or more of the following:
  • –   5 days to 1 year in jail.
  • –   30 to 90 days of community service
  • –   Driver’s license revocation and denial for a minimum of 1 year (minimum of 5 years if there was a prior revocation within 7 years).
  • –    License plate confiscation.
  • –   Vehicle immobilization for 90 to 180 days, unless the vehicle is forfeited.
  • –    Possible vehicle forfeiture.
  • –    6 points added to the offender’s driving record.
  • –   Driver Responsibility Fee of $1,000 for 2 consecutive years.

From The State of Michigan Website

It is a crime for a driver to have a bodily alcohol content (BAC) of .08 or greater if over age 21 or .02 or greater if under 21. In addition, Michigan has a high-BAC law with enhanced penalties for anyone caught driving with a BAC of .17 or higher. However, drivers can be arrested at any BAC level if they exhibit signs of impairment while operating a motor vehicle.

Drivers with any amount of a Schedule 1 controlled substance and/or cocaine are subject to the same fines and penalties as drunk drivers, even if they show no signs of impairment. The only exception is an individual who has a valid medical marijuana card and is driving with marijuana in his or her system. Under the law, an officer must show they are impaired due to that marijuana. 


Costs and Consequences of a Drunk Driving Conviction

Here are possible Michigan DUI / OWI Penalties for a first offender: 

If BAC is below .17 and this is a first offense:

  • Up to $500 fine
  • Up to 93 days in jail
  • Up to 360 hours of community service
  • Up to 180 days license suspension
  • 6 points on a driver’s license

If BAC is .17 or higher and this is a first offense:

  • Up to $700 fine
  • Up to 180 days in jail
  • Up to 360 hours of community service
  • Up to one year license suspension
  • 6 points on a driver’s license
  • Mandatory completion of an alcohol treatment program
  • Ignition interlock use and compliance after 45 days license suspension is required to receive a restricted driver’s license. Convicted drunk drivers have limited driving privileges, are prohibited from operating a vehicle without an approved and properly installed ignition interlock device, and are responsible for all installation and upkeep costs for the device.

Anyone who refuses a breath test the first time is given an automatic one-year driver’s license suspension. For a second refusal within seven years, the suspension is two years.

Convicted drunk drivers are subject to a $1,000 penalty for two consecutive years under the Driver Responsibility Act, for a total of $2,000 in additional costs.

Safer Alternatives

Tens of thousands of people are arrested annually in Michigan for alcohol-related driving offenses. To avoid a drunk driving arrest and the costs associated with such an arrest:

  • Designate a sober driver before drinking alcohol
  • Call a friend, cab, ride service
  • Walk, or take the bus (and maybe get a public drunk ticket)
  • Stay overnight

If you are from the future then you may want to check out this page for any new laws or updates. I’m sure there are some because that’s all lawmakers do to justify their salaries. We don’t need so many and if you are from the future you may have defunded them already. Website (if the web is still a thing).

Need that OWI Slate Cleaned – Call Komorn Law

Michigan Annual Drunk Driving Audit

https://www.michigan.gov/msp/public-information/statistics/michigan-annual-drunk-driving-audit

#partytime

Komorn Law Social Media

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

2nd amendment 2020 2021 BMMR CBD corruption. prosecutors dispensary Driving DUI forfeiture gun rights hemp komornlaw lara law enforcement abuse laws Legalization marijuana Medical Marijuana Michigan michigan laws michigan news MMFLA MRA news police politics Recreational Cannabis science usa news

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.