Better Made vs. Cannabis Companies: A Michigan Trademark Dispute
Summary
Better Made, is embroiled in a legal battle with over a dozen cannabis businesses in the state. The lawsuit, filed in March 2024, centers on allegations of trademark infringement. Better Made claims a cannabis brand named “Better Smoke” is using a logo confusingly similar to their own, potentially misleading consumers and damaging their brand reputation.
Trademark Infringement Claims
Better Made asserts that the “Better Smoke” logo replicates key elements of their established trademark. This includes a similar design layout and potentially the use of a similar color scheme. The lawsuit argues that this similarity is likely to cause consumer confusion, leading people to believe the cannabis products are somehow affiliated with Better Made potato chips.
Protecting Brand Identity
The core of Better Made’s case rests on the concept of trademark infringement. Trademarks are symbols or designs that identify a specific source of goods or services. By establishing a trademark, companies gain legal protection against others using confusingly similar marks that could mislead consumers.
Dangers of Dilution
Beyond simply avoiding confusion, Better Made also claims trademark dilution. This legal concept protects against uses that weaken the distinctiveness of a brand, even if there’s no immediate confusion. In this case, Better Made argues that the “Better Smoke” brand chips away at the unique identity they’ve built for their own products.
Legal Repercussions
Better Made seeks both monetary damages and an injunction. An injunction is a court order prohibiting the defendants from using the allegedly infringing logo. If successful, this could force the “Better Smoke” brand to redesign its packaging and marketing materials.
The Road Ahead
The outcome of this lawsuit will be closely watched by businesses in both the food and cannabis industries. A win for Better Made could set a precedent for how established brands can protect themselves from potential confusion caused by cannabis businesses using similar names or logos.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I smoked several joints and consumed too many marijuana edibles at a concert in the park. Is that legal??
Answer: If it was not a state licensed consumption event the answer is no. It is unlawful to smoke marijuana in public places. The Gov needs to get their cut.
333.27954 Scope of act; unauthorized activities with marihuana and marihuana accessories; limitations; application of privileges, rights, immunities, and defenses under other marihuana laws; employer rights; property owner rights.
Sec. 4. 1. This act does not authorize:
(e) consuming marihuana in a public place or smoking marihuana where prohibited by the person who owns, occupies, or manages the property, except for purposes of this subdivision a public place does not include an area designated for consumption within a municipality that has authorized consumption in designated areas that are not accessible to persons under 21 years of age;
Read the Law
https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-Initiated-Law-1-of-2018.pdf
Related Articles
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
More Posts
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 801-807 Hearsay Evidence
Michigan Rules of Evidence 801-807 Hearsay: In the courtroom, truth-finding is paramount. Yet, not...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 701-707 Opinions
Opinions - Everyone's got one or two or three: A Look at Michigan Rules of Evidence 701-707 Lay...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 601-615 Witnesses
Navigating the Witness Box: A Look at Michigan Rules of Evidence 601-615 In the courtroom, witness...
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall LANSING, MI -- A Michigan Court of...
Another city approves to deprioritize enforcement of psychedelics
Another city in Michigan has recently agreed to prioritize local enforcement of laws pertaining to...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 501 – Privilege in General
Rule 501. Privilege; General Rule. Privilege is governed by the common law, except as modified by...
Decision holding mandatory life without parole unconstitutional
COA 352569 PEOPLE OF MI V JOHN ANTONIO POOLE Opinion People v Poole (Docket No. 352569) decided...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: A Guide to Rules 401-411
Understanding the Foundation: A Summary of Michigan Rules of Evidence 401-411 The Michigan Rules...
Legal Consequences of Rescheduling Marijuana – 2024
Legal Consequences of Rescheduling Marijuana Jan 2024 a report from the Congressional Research Service.
Michigan Marijuana Sales Surpassed $3 Billion In 2023
In 2023 according to sources on the internet the Michigan lottery made 46 million , liquor taxes...